User talk:AmHistorian

Proposed deletion of Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review


The article Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable 3rd party sources demonstrating that this new student publication meets the WP:NJOURNAL criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 10:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scottish Parliamentary Review


The article Scottish Parliamentary Review has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this publication meets the notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

--AmHistorian (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)== July 2013 ==/* July 2013 */ Am new to this, so please forgive the missteps. The Scottish Parliamentary Review has just published and begun distributing. It's being reviewed and external links will be provided soon. Writers and researchers need to find it. It is Scotland's first legislative review. If you give me a few more weeks, I will provide more reliable, secondary resource links. Thank you! Saamir/AmHistorian. Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Scottish Parliamentary Review. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edinburgh Napier Student Law Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scottish Parliamentary Review, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. AllyD (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Scottish Parliamentary Review for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scottish Parliamentary Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scottish Parliamentary Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scottish Parliamentary Review


A tag has been placed on Scottish Parliamentary Review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Association with Scottish Parliamentary Review / Blacket Avenue Press
Given the focus of your editing history and Wikipedia's guidelines on editing with Conflict of Interest, can you please declare here whether you are in any way associated with the Scottish Parliamentary Review and/or Blacket Avenue Press? AllyD (talk) 06:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
DES (talk) 22:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:AmHistorian/Scottish Parliamentary Review
User:AmHistorian/Scottish Parliamentary Review, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AmHistorian/Scottish Parliamentary Review and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:AmHistorian/Scottish Parliamentary Review during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)