User talk:AmRen93

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thatguy69 23:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits

 * 1) Don't violate copyrights
 * 2) Read up on conflict of interest
 * 3) Don't sign your contributions to articles. Signatures are made for discussion pages. --Wafulz 00:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on August 22, 1993, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 23:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Yisodai yisroel
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jacob Baror
A tag has been placed on Jacob Baror requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Δnnuit  Cœptis  01:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jacob Breuer has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 03:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Liepman Philip Prins
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Liepman Philip Prins, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0016_0_16099.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Liepman Philip Prins
A tag has been placed on Liepman Philip Prins, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page David Shire has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. kcylsnavS 02:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Giraffe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JoJan (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories and sources
Please do not continue to add religious categories to biography articles without ensuring that the category is supported by sourced article content, that the individual personally identified with the religious category, and that the category is relevant to the subject's notability. Additional information can be found at WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS. In addition, it is very important that information you add to articles includes sources for verification. Any addition of information to articles that is not verifiable will likely be removed. -- Jezebel's  Ponyo bons mots 15:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

ALL edits by me are either on the basis of sourced fact or the likeliest meaning of available sourced fact! If a person has a Jewish name and is interred in a Jewish cemetery and is known to have had association with the Jewish community as a whole; i consider it within reason to assume their jewishness unless otherwise verified. If there are any such edits of mine that have been factually WRONG then please list them below. Until then..... THANK YOU! --*Merkin* 22:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Making you own deductions is considered original research, and using multiple threads of information to come to a deduction is synthesis, neither of which meet the policy verification through reliable sources. In order to remain within Wikipedia policy, please do not add the religious and ethnic categories unless they explicitly meet the requirements of WP:BLP and/or WP:EGRS. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:17, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: William Schneider (politician)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as William Schneider (politician), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.maine.gov/ag/about/message.shtml, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:William Schneider (politician) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, William Schneider (politician), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:William Schneider (politician) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:William Schneider (politician). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:William Schneider (politician) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Opus 113 (talk) 11:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Irving I. Stone


The article Irving I. Stone has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Baseball  Watcher  01:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

See article Irving I. Stone. I added three basic sources. If you google his name you could easily find more. Thanks--*Merkin* 01:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)!

Proposed deletion of Mordechai Ben-Horin


The article Mordechai Ben-Horin has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Response: i provided references.

Linking dates
Do not link dates, months, years, etc. That has been discontinued on Wikipedia a few years ago. Reason: this type of link is completely without reason. This is all well-documented in WP:MOS, I just want to bring it to your attention. Your edits, adding links to dates, have been rollbacked. Debresser (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hunt Family of Vermont


A tag has been placed on Hunt Family of Vermont requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; RHaworth 21:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Hunt family members of Vermont
I noticed your recent attempt to provide sourcing for the above referenced article. While the effort is appreciated, we need references that meet the criteria for independence and reliability. Unfortunately, self-published, genealogical records do not meet the criteria. Therefore, the content has been removed. If you have questions or need assistance, please feel free to contact me. Best regards,  Cind. amuse  07:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Lander


A tag has been placed on Daniel Lander requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spanish Bus Company


A tag has been placed on Spanish Bus Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jeancey (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ahavas Israel Synagogue


The article Ahavas Israel Synagogue has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for organisations or the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – hysteria18 (talk) 22:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. When you recently edited Mark Gelernter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College of Architecture and Planning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Book storage
Hello, AmRen93. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Book storage, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, User:Spacevezontalk 20:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Roger Kahn
I have reverted your edit in Roger Kahn. American Jews is the parent category of Jewish American writers and is therefore redundant.--Wlmg (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558082109 your edit] to Passaic High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonardo Plaza Hotel Jerusalem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King George Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Heinrich Marx for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heinrich Marx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heinrich Marx until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  // Timothy ::  talk  03:52, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Passaic Torah Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Passaic Torah Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Passaic Torah Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alansohn (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)