User talk:AmadaDean

License tagging for Image:Mexicocity2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mexicocity2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Sources and neutrality
Please review Wikipedia policies on using reliable sources and maintaining a neutral point of view. Your edits to Seth Sabal could be construed as vandalism in the service of advertising. Robertissimo 04:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I should probably also call your attention to the three-revert rule that says "an editor must not perform more than three reversions, in whole or in part, on a single Wikipedia article within a 24 hour period." Robertissimo 04:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Seth Sabal
Your comment about bullies seems rather ironic considering that you have vandalized the Seth Sabal pages by removing the Article for Deletion notice. These notices serve as a warning to all parties -- those in favor of an article and those who do not think the subject merits an entry. Please refrain from this behaviour in the future. SteveHopson 15:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Mexicocity2.jpg
You uploaded Image:Mexicocity2.jpg. I've just proposed its deletion; if you disagree, please argue your point on that page. Thanks. -- Hoary 06:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Land1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Land1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)