User talk:Amae2

I would put Gaze first and then comprehension. Other than that it looks lovely! LianneAnna (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind, I put it in near the end. I also added something I found about how early joint attention may start under the joint attenion in humans section (because I didn't really know where to put it)and am now owrking on expanding the theory section. NadRose (talk) 03:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC) So far it looks really good! Where will we put the socio-emotional stuff? I've almost got it ready.NadRose (talk) 01:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!
Amae2,

This looks like a good choice of topic. I think you might find some useful references in our reading for Friday in Chapter 4. Wolf specifically mentions rapid naming as an excellent predictor of later reading skill.

I'll keep an eye out for your plan for improvement

Paula Marentette (talk) 16:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Alison!

Just a friendly reminder to check your citations style! If you are using Chicago or APA for your reference list, please check that your format is correct. The QuickGuides (http://www.library.ualberta.ca/augustana/citations/) are a great place to start. For inline citations, please review the tips provided by Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Inline_citations).

Happy Halloween! Gorakshep (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on submitting to Did You Know! We'll see what happens with it.

Paula Marentette (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Alison,

How is your wiki assignment going? Have you submited your article to "Did you know" yet? I'm a little confused. Are we actually making changes to our original articles and submitting them? I thought we're supposed to sumbit what's in our sandbox, which I'm not even sure how to sumbit it to DYK. It looks like it's impossible to submit what's in the sandbox; hmmmm. Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

142.59.177.37 (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Alison,

I sent you a message earlier, and didn't know that I wasn't logged on. Sorry about that. I already figured out how to go about it... Thanks.

Julietbee (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Alison! How's your Did You Know submission going? Hope all is well!

Gorakshep (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ExampleRapidAutomatizedNaming.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ExampleRapidAutomatizedNaming.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Good Article?
Amae2

I made more comments, though by now they are fairly picky points, on the RAN article talk page. I also did a few minor edits so you may want to check that you agree with them. This article is looking great. You'll need to sort out whatever the tag is about the image, which as you don't have one, confuses me (did they remove it?). I'd say once you have a look at my comments, many of which are oriented to improving clarity, then you are ready for good article submission. Great work!

Paula Marentette (talk) 00:23, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Suggestion
Hi Amae2,

Thanks for the comment!

Julietbee (talk) 22:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi Amae2,

I think you were looking at the wrong article; probably the original one, because the revised article had a slightly different title. Which one did you comment on? "Eye movement in language reading," or "Eye movements in reading"? I just improved the original article last night (well, it'd been improved since last two weeks, but the title was changed a bit for the DYK submission). You're always welcome to make comments. So let me know what you think. Thanks.

Julietbee (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you!
Amae2,

Thanks for the citation on the vocabulary development page. It's been really useful for the section I'm working on so far.

Alindsay9 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC).

Joint Attention
The sentence that need citations are:

It is achieved when one individual alerts another to an object by means of eye-gazing, pointing or other verbal or non-verbal indication.

&

In this situation the individual who points is "initiating joint attention" and the individual who looks to the object is "responding to joint attention".

Anything else I may have been talking about (I can't remember exactly anymore)looks good now.

And if you are trying to tackle the history of JA problem, would you like me to work on dogs and JA?

LianneAnna (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Re Joint attention reassessment
An article that you have been involved in editing, Joint attention has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the Talk:Joint_attention. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Please contact me if you have any questions. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Joint attention
Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey
Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)