User talk:Amagiccat

A tag has been placed on Zhìzūnyuánzǐdàoquán, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jimmi Hugh 15:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Pascal.Tesson 15:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Zhìzūnyuánzǐdàoquán
A "" template has been added to the article Zhìzūnyuánzǐdàoquán, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  16:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Please stop recreating this page. If you can provide any evidence that this thing actually exists, let me know on my talk page. Until then, I have protected the page against recreation. Pascal.Tesson 16:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... You seem to be having a hard time with the sentence: "please stop recreating this page". The page is now protected against recreation though. Please let me know on my talk page why I should believe that this article is not complete bogus. Pascal.Tesson 16:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Dear Magiccat, the reason this article has been deleted is because there is no evidence that it describes something that really exists. There are NO Google hits for the word, and this means it is very unlikely to be notable. If you can find some evidence that this thing really exists, it might be possible to write an article, but until then you will find anything you write will likely suffer the same fate. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk to me)  16:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Civility
Please remain civil in your interactions with other users. Kim does not deserve this. On top of that it may or may not have occurred to you that the article you wrote is highly dubious. An ancient martial art whose name translates as "Supreme atomic zodiac fist"? Please... All that being said, I have to warn you that continued disruption of Wikipedia will result in this account being blocked from editing. Pascal.Tesson 22:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)