User talk:Amalfred/Colorimetric capnography

Peer Review
Hey Andrew! Great article! Hope you take all my feedback with a grain of salt.

I thought some of the language used was maybe a little casual "detects whether or not CO2..." could be "detects the presence of CO2", similar thoughts with "of course, physical exam..." later

Some things could use Wikipedia links - litmus paper, endotracheal tube, mucous plugging, etc.

I think some terms like "airway circuit" could either use more explanation or be replaced with simpler terminology.

This is one subject where I think a picture could be really valuable, if possible to obtain with copyright issues.

It looks like some of the citations have dating issues? I personally fixed this by changing the date from something like "2018-2" to just "2018", but not sure this is the appropriate fix.

I thought the flow of the article was great, it seemed appropriately ordered in terms of importance and you didn't stray off topic from the header. I think it has a good number of sections and the topic is adequately explored. PatrickReichhold (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the feedback, I'll definitely make the wording changes. "Airway circuit" is a term I'll try to explain parenthetically, good idea. I also added the links to other articles, good point there. Thanks! Amalfred (talk) 02:02, 11 December 2023 (UTC)