User talk:Aman4Bebo

Welcome!

 * }

August 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karishma Kapoor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Commander (Ping Me) 16:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Dangerous Ishq"
A page you created, Dangerous Ishq, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Karishma Kapoor. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Commander (Ping Me) 16:22, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Satte Pe Satta Remake


A tag has been placed on Satte Pe Satta Remake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NtheP (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Filmography
Please do not add rowspans to filmography tables as you did to Amrita Arora. See ACTOR for further details. ---  Managerarc   ™ talk  22:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Pls stop adding rowspans to filmography tables. It's not advisable to use that style. -- Commander (Ping Me) 15:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Rani Mukerji. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Commander (Ping Me) 15:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Preity Zinta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Commander (Ping Me) 15:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Preity Zinta. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Commander  (Ping Me) 16:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Jacqueline Fernandez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Commander (Ping Me) 13:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. You have been warned multiple times by multiple editors not to do this, yet you have continued. During your block you can read through the relevant policies and guidelines and when you come back to edit, please do so collaboratively. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. StormContent (talk) 13:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ameesha Patel with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  14:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ameesha Patel with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  14:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kangna Ranaut with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ  14:17, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2011 (UTC)