User talk:Amanaparts

December 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to War crimes in the Kosovo War, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  00:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * All changes have been made based on independent sources for the sake of accuracy. The articles I contributed to are poorly quoted and contain inaccurate or wrong quotation. Some of the information's do not even have a source and only serve as propaganda. I did not violate any policy or guideline since my sole purpose for edition is to improve the articles by considering relevant sources or deleting text without sources.

Amanaparts (talk) 10:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War crimes in the Kosovo War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  17:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Telephone numbers in Serbia, you may be blocked from editing.  Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  18:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Anastan has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  18:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

You MUST stop with your edits and reverts. Use talk page to gain consensus. If not, you will be blocked from editing. -- Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  18:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

I understand that you are not a new user. You immediately, upon creation, asked for changes in article protection. Please don't warn experienced users. You need to explain your revert. The authors are reliable, political scientists. Can you refute it?--Z oupan 21:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * if you want any edits please use talk page to gain consensus. The book itself does not show any sources of their claims. If you want to add sources, prove reliability.

ARBMAC warning
-- Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  18:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 22:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Kosovo Liberation Army
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)