User talk:Amanayabo101

Your last edits constitute vandalism per Wikipedia rules. Please do not make any further changes to this article without an explanation. This unsigned comment was added by User:Teachlawyer554.


 * I recommend you ignore the comment above. It was placed by a brand new user and the edit to which he / she is referring was not vandalism. You are allowed to remove the comment from this page if you wish. Thanks. Unusual? Quite  TalkQu  19:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Roberto Petz
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Roberto Petz, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Roberto Petz seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Roberto Petz, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

advice
See our FAQ (on businesses and other organisations) DGG (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) you must use a personal user name, not one that reflects your institution-- just pick another, and say on the user pagewhat your affiliation is.
 * 2) When entering pages for SOAS alumni, be careful to show by sources why and how they are notable. I recognize that Petz's position is notable, and therefore, As reviewing administrator, I removed the speedy tag, but the article is still likely to be challenged.  You need something else in addition to the entry in the alumni newsletter. See WP:BIO for our general rules for notability. Forexample, if he holds this position, he is likely to have been mentioned in the business press. Add such a reference.
 * 3) there may be some concern to the effect that the information in the newsletter represents what the people say about themselves only, and is therefore not the required 3rd party independent reliable published source
 * 4) If possible, find a source--perhaps at the company--which gives some more details of his career.
 * 5) some types of positions here are considered obviously notable: MPs, ambassadors, but they still need some good external sources.
 * 6) for faculty see WP:PROF.
 * 7) Also see the two excellent books on writing for Wikipedia that have recently appeared: Broughton, John. Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. The missing manual. Cambridge: O'Reilly, 2008, ISBN 9780596515164, (available online at http://safari.oreilly.com) and Ayers, Phoebe, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates.How Wikipedia Works: And How You Can Be a Part of It. San Francisco: No Starch Press, 2008 ISBN 9781593271763 (also available online, at http://www.nostarch.com)
 * 8) I'd advise you to add this very quickly to his bio, and check the others, before they get nominated for regular deletion. things move very fast here.

Speedy deletion of Roberto Petz
A tag has been placed on Roberto Petz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nuttah (talk) 10:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Erelu Olusola Obada - Official Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Erelu Olusola Obada - Official Portrait.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Duke University
I am going to assume good faith that you didn't see the content that you did indeed remove about Duke being the 7th wealthiest university. However, I would like to suggest a better use of the edit summary -- it's only for describing what you're adding/changing and why -- not to write chat-like messages. Also over-detail in the lead is discouraged, and it doesn't matter that it makes it difficult for readers to find something (dubious in this case as there is a clearly labeled section for it) or whether other articles do it that way (they're wrong too). Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)