User talk:AmandaGayle18

June 2021
Hello, I'm HMSLavender. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christian mythology seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 01:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I saw where the Christian mythology page was about actually mythical stories written by Christian authors with Christian tones but the Four Horsmen article does need correcting. It stated that the story comes from a mythological story but it actually comes from a historical book called the Holy Bible. That one did need correcting.
 * Thanks! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Revelation absolutely does not qualify as historical. Please use the general topic of Christian mythology as a descriptor instead of referring specifically to the Bible. —C.Fred (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

The Bible is most definitely a historical reference/book. You are incredibly wrong! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 01:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

If someone wanted to read the story of the Four Horsemen what book would they find it in? AmandaGayle18 (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * John of Patmos' vision of the Four Horsemen is in the Book of Revelation, which is included by most (all?) Christian churches within the New Testament. Vision, prophecy, whatever, it falls within the broad spectrum of Christian mythology. —C.Fred (talk) 02:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your giving incorrect information. People should know the source of the story not YOUR interpretation of the story! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You’re AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Which the article states: it's Christian mythology as found in the Book of Revelation in the New Testament. —C.Fred (talk) 02:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

It isn’t mythology.. It is called a prophecy. You are butchering the original source of which the story originates. AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * With all due respect, it is the conflating of a book of myths, allegories and tales—some of which may be historical or have their roots in historical events—with a book of absolute history is the act of butchering that's going on here. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Y’all banned me because I wanted to include he actual source for a story? That is bonkers!!!! But it is sadly too common nowadays to have truth blocked by big tech and alike! You’re not giving the actual source!! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia gives no preference to any one religion over another. Christian mythology doesn't get a pass because it's Christianity. —C.Fred (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Wow!! Lie after lie!! All I did was add the correct source from which the Four Horsemen came from!! YOU are not including the CORRECT sources!! Just because YOU do not like a historical book called the Bible does not mean that it isn’t the CORRECT source for one to reference the story of the Four Horsemen!! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

I will bow down to the draconian overloads now!!
I just wanted to include to the correct source and didn’t know you could only edit something so many times. They kept changing the article, but I guess they are pros at wiki and knew ALL of the rules whereas I did not. Y’all are giving incorrect/incomplete information. CORRECT sources should be included!! Just because they don’t like the Bible doesn’t mean they should include this historical book as a source. Just because Y’ALL don’t think it’s a historical book doesn’t mean it isn’t!!

Amanda~ AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Are you seriously suggesting the Book of Revelation is a historical text of events that have happened? —C.Fred (talk) 02:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Not what I said Fred!! Go back and try reading what I said again! I said the BOOK for which the story came from was a historical book!! Which it is!!! AmandaGayle18 (talk) 02:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Banned for trying to include the CORRECT source from which a story was derived from. It’s cool tho.. everybody knows Wiki is NOT a reliable source for anything. Truth and reliable sources are important ✌️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmandaGayle18 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You are correct, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. We don't pretend to be. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)