User talk:Amanda Lolly

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Proclamation of Rebellion was changed by Amanda Lolly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981841 on 2013-01-04T19:21:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Canthusus. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Proclamation of Rebellion because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Canthusus (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bora Bora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bora Bora was changed by Amanda Lolly (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-01-04T19:25:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Satear Keo


A tag has been placed on Satear Keo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Canthusus (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)