User talk:Amansbach

A tag has been placed on William crabtreee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Proofreader J-Man 03:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

infield fly rule
That is the exact wording in the MLB rules. The ball is alive and runners may advance at the risk of the ball being caught, or retouch and advance after the ball is touched, the same as on any fly ball. The wording is not perfect, but it means no tag up required. The first choice is simply to advance, the second one is to retouch and advance. The first has a risk of the ball being caught. The choice is same as on any fly ball.

You'd need to find a LL interpretation or clarifying comment that makes the meaning different at that level. Saros136 (talk) 03:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Accepted your article
Hi Aman, I looked the article over and moved it into regular space. Could not find an article existing for this and it is a large notable topic. (Needs more than a section in another article).

Can still use some work on the formatting, but hopefully people pitch in and help on that.

TCO (talk) 09:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)