User talk:Amarburger18/sandbox

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''' Yes, everything is related to the article topic of environmental science. The article did not have anything off topic that distracted me. The only thing that could be possibly distracting is the "regulations driving the studies" section. It did not seem that relevant to the topic.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''' I do not think so. The article was updated last on January 29, 2019 and it had plenty of information.

What else could be improved? The article be improved with some pictures but other than that, nothing. The article flows and gives plenty of details on to what environmental science is.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''' Yes, the article is neutral. It gets straight to the point and tells you exactly what environmental science and the key components that are make up the science.

Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? Not that I can see. The article seems really balanced with a variety of sources to support what environmental science is.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''' Yes, the links I clicked did work. Each link also supported what the writer was saying.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''' Yes. The sources cited are ones in favor of environmental science and what this science tries to achieve.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There a lot of conversations going on for this article. The comments are all ones that are trying to make the article better or are asking questions about the article.

'''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?''' The article is rated as a C-class. It is part of some WikiProjects.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We have not discussed environmental science in class so I can not really point out any differences but I can say Wikipedia knows what it is doings and tries to help readers get the most and best information out of the topic as it can. Amarburger18 (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)