User talk:Amaugeri26/sandbox

Shannip's peer review
I don't see any contributions to the actual Wikipedia article, so I'm going off of what you have on your sandbox, and am assuming that your intended article is . You have a really great start on your article, however it's incomplete and lacks structure. I see that you (maybe) reference one source (the first paragraph indicates a citation with [1], but I don't see any source referenced), but more sources will definitely be needed. When discussing several options for a given topic, using the phrase "etc." is okay in your own notes, but should not be used in your formal contribution. Additionally, you'll want to standardize if you're talking in first, second, or third person. For example, you write "Before you can proceed with the donation, one needs to determine if the patient has already passed away." Here, you use both second (you) and third (one) person. It's unclear who this "you" and "one" is, so you should select the appropriate option to make the article as clear as possible. When discussing eligibility for organ transplantation, you mention the testing that must be done which is good, and there is a great opportunity for expansion discussing who has priority over who, should you transplant to someone who is older or younger, who decides eligibility, and so on. This may tie in well with the structure of the waiting list. If I'm not mistaken, our textbook discusses some of these dilemmas. I'd love to see more details on payment for organ transplantation, and any costs related to organ donation. Does the person donating the organs (or their family, if they're dead) have to pay for procedures needed to prepare their organs for donation? Does health insurance cover transplantation, and, if so, what parts (the organ, procedure, testing)? You allude to an interesting issue regarding religious situations. Maybe discuss what these are, who they affect, and how they can be solved.
 * 1) REDIRECT Organ Donation

Shannip (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)