User talk:Amaury/2009/August

2009 Archive Index: January • February •  March •  April •  May •  June •  July •  August •  September •  October •  November •  December

Users Syed9090 and Pk7311
There is a new user Pk7311 now doing the same things that Syed9090 did before he got banned. Can it be somehow confirmed that these two accounts belong to the same person? Hamza [ talk ] 07:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

I am referring to edits on MQM and Altaf Hussain —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammad Hamza (talk • contribs) 07:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Jay Brannan and User talk:Jaybrannan
If this and this are representative of how you use Huggle, it might be wise that you stop doing so. Blindly reverting other editors and slapping them with warnings when they are attempting to raise a concern, even if they are doing so in a misguided manner, only adds fuel to the fire. Please be more careful. --auburn pilot  talk  02:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand. My apologies. Thank you for the message. - Amaury (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

What the hell is with you reverting concerned talk by the subject of a BLP, Jay Brannan? BLP is very serious, and censoring the subject of one who has concerns about it is quite astounding. -- AvatarMN (talk) 09:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please don't take this the wrong way, but I must agree. This was not a good use of rollback. Why is it, exactly, that you did that? →javért stargaze 09:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I already got called upon for it. See above discussion. - Amaury (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I don't know what Huggle is, and didn't click the diff links. Well, between what you did, and Beeblebrox stepping on an edit by accident and then not reverting it on purpose, Jay Brannan thinks he's not even allowed to discuss the article and has gone away mad.  -- AvatarMN (talk) 18:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on User:Dcmacnut
A lot can happen when a guy leaves his desk for lunch. DCmacnut &lt; &gt;  18:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. - Amaury (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

User Cryan1800
What makes you say this is nonsense? It looks to me like the user page probably is an attack. The user's only contributions to Wikipedia is this user page, which certainly makes me think this is probably an attack against the individual, not the real Chris Ryan's user page. -- AvatarMN (talk) 09:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure; that's why I didn't revert the IP address' edit on my talk page with Huggle, just manually. - Amaury (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Why revert at all if you're not sure? And when the user comes to your talk page to alert you, why remove that and edit comment so surely that it's nonsense? Not only is it likely that the user page is an attack becuase the user has only edited the page, but the page contained a line about how the subject "identifies as conservative even though his girlfriend (then it names her!) had to get an abortion twice in the seventh grade". That's not something someone writes about themself. You seem to be very careless at reverting, with Huggle or not. -- AvatarMN (talk) 18:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say that. I've improved a lot since December 2008. Just ask Apparition11. - Amaury (talk) 01:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You have improved a lot, but I agree with AvatarMN here. The original revert wasn't vandalism. Then removing his note on your talk page was in poor form. He appears to be concerned for the subject of this "article". Giving him a little help and explaining why you reverted would have helped more than removing the post as "nonsense". For the past couple of weeks, it does seem that you have been making quite a few of mistakes. You really do need to be more careful. If you can't explain why you reverted when the editor asks, then you shouldn't have reverted to begin with. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  01:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll also note that I sent it to MfD here. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  02:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

This edit was poor form. You should not be reverting without more care. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Removing   as a Minor Edit was not good. Please don't do such thing again. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

You seem to be performing all edits as minor edits, and frequently the editos are not minor. Please take more care. Perhaps you should adjust your preferences to make all edits not minor by default. -SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedian of the Day
Congratulations, Zhang He! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "Wikipedian of the Day" award for today, August 20, 2009! Keep up the great work! Note: You could also receive the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week! If you wish, you can add to your userpage.

Happy editing!

[midnight comet]  [talk]  00:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on User:CorpITGuy

 * You're welcome. - Amaury (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:The Black Dahlia Murder (band)
Hi...how was that vandalism??? I fixed it so it wasn't offensive to Danteferno, and you reverted it on The Black Dahlia Murder's talk page. cheese (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter. It's now in the history and people will be able to see it if they go through the history. You cannot let your anger get the best of you. Please continue editing, but be polite from now on. I'll be watching you for the rest of the day, and if I see any more yelling and/or personal attacks, I will report you. Thanks! Happy editing! - Amaury (talk) 23:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

User talk:74.243.221.59
Refer to his talk page history and his contribs list. Clearly disruptive, reported at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 03:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)