User talk:Amaury/2016/December

2016 Archive Index: January • February •  March •  April •  May •  June •  July •  August •  September •  October •  November •  December

HTML Tidy
Apparently that weird issue of the guest stars appearing on the same line when there are plot tags is caused by HTML Tidy, and they are going to get rid of that relatively soon, so those problems should go away after that. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Liv and Maddie: "Cali Christmas-a-Rooney"
In your revert here, you mentioned in the edit summary about Diggie not returning. I recall they mentioned him in the promo for this episode, and surely enough, he was in the episode. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 07:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, that's unfortunate – that's the one character I was hoping would not be returning in season #4... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * How come you don't like Diggie? (Although I assume you have no issues with Ryan, his actor, LOL!) Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 16:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I hate the character!! He's a total goon. It's amusing that for a lot of these kinds of shows, the supposed "main love interest" is a jerk, and the guy they bring on later (e.g. Josh) is always massively superior to the guy the heroine is "supposed" to end up with. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Interesting. For me personally, unless I missed something, I don't remember Diggie being a jerk. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 16:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Watch the series again from the beginning! It's there... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Mech-X4
Hey, Amaury – could you please add Mech-X4 to your watchlist? I just had to remove two episode summaries that were blatant WP:Copyvios, and you seem to be even better at sniffing those out that I am... Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Of course. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 00:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have the series to set to record, but I still haven't decided if it's a series I'm going to keep up with. However, I will go ahead and do a clean-up of the article since it's relatively short, except the access dates since you're stubborn about those even on articles you didn't create. :P Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 19:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As per WP:DATERET and WP:CITESTYLE/WP:CITEVAR, you're always supposed to defer to the first major contributor at the article (whoever that is!) and whatever format they chose for stuff like that. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I look at those more as guidelines than policies, personally, which I know you do as well, but I guess it depends. Anyway, done. Whoever created it cared nothing about making it easy for people to edit in source mode. The episode table was a mess. Thank God it's a short article. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 20:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

List of Stuck in the Middle episodes
I was noticing that IP edit removing the single-camera television sitcoms category. Not sure they have a point there, but I was also noticing in several other LoE articles that the categories in those are different in nature from their main articles - like Category:Lists of American comedy television series episodes or Category:Lists of Disney Channel shows' episodes (took that from List of Best Friends Whenever episodes) - which I don't see in the Stuck in the Middle LoE one. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the message. I do know that I always mess up on the categories for episode lists when splitting articles, something I plan on going through before winter quarter starts, but the IP wasn't really providing any valid reason to justify its removal. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 14:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Paradise Run
I'm working off of information given to me by the executive producer of Paradise Run. Some of your information is incorrect like the production company and producers, and I'm also adding more information to all sections. This is my first time editing on wikipedia so I'm sorry if this is the incorrect way to do it but I was told to fix. Patnickg (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)patnickg
 * You're really just adding a bunch of a bloat and not improving the article at all. Also, you have a WP:CONFLICT, and because of that, it is very strongly encouraged that you don't edit articles in which you have a conflict of interest. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 18:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Henry Danger
I'm guessing you watch more Henry Danger than I do?... If so, I'd recommend going through the 'Character' descriptions there – they need some trimming, and I already found one mistake (and I'm just an infrequent viewer!). I'm guessing somebody who knows more about the show can do a better job at improving the 'Characters' section. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed a bunch that didn't belong there. I didn't see anything wrong with the rest. :) Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 05:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Jeffrey Guterman
Why are you allowing someone with no notability to write their own bio here? This is against your own rules. This deletion request is perfectly constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.230.121.150 (talk) 01:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

How is a deletion proposal vandalism? You have yet to answer my question. How is this guy notable and why should this article be here? Please tell me. Until then I will keep reverting the deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.230.121.150 (talk) 02:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The article has been up since 2005. If there were a problem, there would have been deletion requests a long time ago. I suggest you knock it off. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Irrelevant. No one noticed it I guess, the guy uses it as a personal advertisement. Why not I just create an article about myself, since I was born and have a job. Is that your only requirement? You have no good reason to keep this article. I already had one mod/admin agree with me. Delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.230.121.150 (talk) 02:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It is relevant. It's been up since 2005, and no one's noticed this alleged issue until now? Yeah, no. Someone would have noticed any issues with it long ago. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 02:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You have a lot of articles? Who cares if no one noticed an issue until now. It is still an issue. Prove to me this guy is notable and deserves an article. You can't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.230.121.150 (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * As the article has been WP:DEPRODDED, please use the Articles for deletion process to list the article for a deletion discussion. Do not restore the Proposed deletion tag to the article, as it would just be declined. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 02:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the heads up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.230.121.150 (talk) 02:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

UFC 58
Hi there, I don't understand the edit you reversed on the UFC 58 page. Could you define 'constructive'? Thanks man. 194.125.36.25 (talk) 02:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Monteria
I wasn't trying to disrupt Monteria 2601:6C4:205:AAC0:89BC:8428:C4AD:55DE (talk) 02:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

The Thundermans and Girl Meets World
I came across edits from User:Magioladitis in the two articles where they are removing a comment, and wound up screwing up the ratings table, so I needed to revert the edits, saying in my edit summary that it may be better to delete the commented-out part (the row(s) for the special episodes). I'm not exactly sure why there is a row for the special episodes, and I recall there being discussion about it from at least one other editor not too long ago. Was probably wise to comment out the rows, except that there are other comments within these rows. Unfortunately, the way things are right now, Wikipedia does not support nesting of the "" symbols for hidden comments, and Magioladitis' edits messed things up because of this limitation. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * MPFitz1968 Thanks for the heads up. to maybe help on that. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I can go ahead and remove them for now if that's best until and if comes up with something to list specials there per the discussion on the subject a while back on your talk page. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 18:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologies for my lack of action - I return from Christmas holidays this Wednesday, so I'll get a start on it then for you! (That is, if my memory doesn't fail me.) Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 01:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries, and thank you so much! If you need a refresher, see here. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 04:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Magioladitis and AlexTheWhovian, instead of nesting comment tags, you can use Template:Void for the outer comment tags. Frietjes (talk) 14:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas from Apparition11
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Amaury: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 18:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Happy holidays from Callmemirela

 * Merry Christmas, ! Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 04:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year from Bradford

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message