User talk:Amavas Ki Raat

Proposed deletion of Bhangarh: The Last Episode


The article Bhangarh: The Last Episode has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhangarh: The Last Episode for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhangarh: The Last Episode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhangarh: The Last Episode until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Critical reception
Re: this, before you write another critical reception section, you need to first familiarise yourself with our policy on neutral point of view. Wikipedia isn't in the business of drooling over films or using hyperbolic phrasing like "rotten" to describe a film or "failure", "disaster", "all-time super blockbuster status", etc. Further, the phrasing "mixed to negative", "mixed to positive" is absolutely meaningless, since "mixed" already means "positive and negative". Multiple WikiProjects shun this language, including WikiProject Film. And, if you're going to include Rotten Tomatoes figures, you have to present the data in a way that the community prefers. It's all laid out at MOS:FILM. You should also consider whether or not the data is statistically significant. 7 reviews with no critical consensus is probably not sufficient to arrive at a conclusion about the performance of the film. And frankly, I wouldn't consider Rotten Tomatoes a fantastic source for Indian film critical aggregations.

The rest of the content was problematic for one reason or another, including that you failed to properly capitalise people's names in accordance with basic English rules, and other issues. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 20:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)