User talk:Amazingandlively

Welcome!
Hello, Amazingandlively, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lara Technologies, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mean as custard (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Lara Technologies


A tag has been placed on Lara Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lara Technologies


A tag has been placed on Lara Technologies, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lara Technologies


A tag has been placed on Lara Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rebb ing   05:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Lara Technologies‎‎, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Rebb ing   05:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Lara Technologies. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Lara Technologies. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. GSS (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Lara Technologies.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

A personal note
I get that this must be very frustrating for you, but you've got to remember that Wikipedia is a real encyclopedia, not an online bulletin board. You wouldn't expect Encyclopedia Brittanica to publish someone's poorly-edited advertising piece, would you? Of course not! So show some respect for the project and learn how to write articles (and what's required of them) before insisting that we publish yours. I understand this must be frustrating for you, and I sympathize—I really do. It took me at least a forty hours of work and studying to get my footing as an editor, and I'm still learning. Best wishes. Rebb ing   06:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lara Technologies


A tag has been placed on Lara Technologies, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk) 11:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop creating articles about your company. Read the links above, as well as WP:COI. If you continue to create this, you will be blocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Inventateq


A tag has been placed on Inventateq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patton Refrigeration


The article Patton Refrigeration has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subject lacks coverage in independent RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 23:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of R.C. Natarajan


The article R.C. Natarajan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I do not believe that this person meets the notability guideline for professors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tazerdadog (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

AfD- see Articles for deletion/R.C. Natarajan
I have started a diskussion on whether R.C. Natarajan should be included in Wikipedia. You can find that discussion here.

Cheers, Tazerdadog (talk) 08:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Tazerdadog (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Patton Refrigeration for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patton Refrigeration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Patton Refrigeration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tazerdadog (talk) 05:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laborate Pharmaceuticals


The article Laborate Pharmaceuticals has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Failed WP:CORP coverage-in-depth criterion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

A question about your editing
Hi there Amazingandlively. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions especially the articles you created, Amagi Media Labs, R.C. Natarajan, Laborate Pharmaceuticals, Patton Refrigeration, Fakhri Ahmadov and Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK). I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Partly yes, meaning I have been paid for a few of the articles I have written here. Amazingandlively (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. The terms of use require you to indicate certain information about your paid editing. I will follow this with the boilerplate message for paid editors. Brianhe (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Disclosure required for paid editors
Hello Amazingandlively. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Brianhe (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amagi Media Labs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amagi Media Labs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amagi Media Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Your Kids 'R' Our Kids (YKROK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Fakhri Ahmadov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fakhri Ahmadov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fakhri Ahmadov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Laborate Pharmaceuticals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laborate Pharmaceuticals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laborate Pharmaceuticals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)