User talk:AmberPétursson

Only warning
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 03:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

OfferJC7V7DC5768 (talk) 04:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I reported you because of a pattern I see of vandalism by you. If you show you won't vandalize anymore and contribute positively, I will remove your report from AIV.

I have already made beneficial edits. I don't understand why you're interpreting this that i'm only here for vandalism?

And how do you want me to "show" this?

This is why nobody like wikipedia and stays away from it. People get dogged for absolutely nothing.

==Apology- I made a mistake and removed your report. I saw your first edit and a edit you reverted of yourself and jumped to conclusions. But you did make a chance without a source (replacing some with most, that's a big change) Aplogies JC7V7DC5768 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:13, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 04:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello the possible vandalism I found was this, this, this, this, this and this.  They haven't explained their edits in the edit summary and I read it as vandalism.  Looking at the people that reverted, I'm not the only one.  Hope this helps you.--5 albert square (talk) 10:34, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * That does, thank you. -- The SandDoctor Talk 21:11, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Okay the first one was to my own user talk page. I did not think that would be considered vandalism, nor did I think that of changing the wording from "sperm" to "spermatozoa" on links that linked to "spermatozoon" (the singular of spermatozoa). I guess my mistake there was not filling out the edit summary, but I promise you I had no ill intent.

As said before, the edit to Suplex was done as a joke, and that I reverted it myself immediately afterwards. May I ask what I can do to convince you that it will not happen again? I understand now that people can interpret certain edits to my own talk page as also vandalism and that I should make use of edit summaries.

I made this and this edit adding useful, relevant links that I felt should have already been there. This edit changed a link from a redirect into the article that it redirected into (I don't understand why it was reverted).

They may only be three edits but I hope they show that I'm not here to cause disruptions. AmberPétursson (talk) 04:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)