User talk:Amberrock

Need help to delete a revision in revision history.
I Need an administrators help to delete a revision in revision history on a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sellsomepapers (talk • contribs) 18:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I see you have resolved this with Edgar181. Would have been happy to help, but it seems it's not longer necessary. Cheers!  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  20:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Centre Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Town Center ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Centre_Town check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Centre_Town?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Use of user information templates
Would be better if you checked around a bit before adding a template saying "Welcome to Wikipedia" to the talk page of a user who is on WP for 6 years with a total of approximately 13,000 edits —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 20:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If I somehow offended you by welcoming you to Wikipedia, then I apologize. The point of that message wasn't wishing you a pleasant stay, though, but to notify you that pages in the article namespace aren't meant for tests. I still stand by that. —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  16:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Need some help
I somehow messed up part of The 100 Wiki page, I have no idea how I did it (I was trying to add in missing info) and somehow everything got re-arranged, I'm some-what new to wikipedia and would love if you could help me out, thanks! - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cxlum (talk • contribs) 13:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I get what you were trying to do! Tables on Wikipedia can be finicky and removing one seemingly unimportant character can result in whole articles becoming unreadable. I will help you add your info tonight, after I finish my work. —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  13:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * On second thought: I see you've figured it out on yourself. Awesome!  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  16:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The whole table has actually jumped down to the Ratings section instead of being in the Home Media section depsite it being written in that section, I'm not sure how that works. Thank you for all the help though, I've definitely learned a lot today!Cxlum (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Odd. It looked alright from my perspective. Regardless: cheers!  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  09:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, it seems someone else fixed it. Thank you! Cxlum (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

It was not a mistake!
I just edited the Sharon Tate article without giving a reason why. I'm sorry, I couldn't find it. The reason I deleted that line was because it spoiled "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" and I wouldn't want any person reading Tate's article before watching the movie (which is very possible!) getting the movie spoiled for no reason.

I will be look for the edit summary form more carefully next time.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattPadula (talk • contribs) 00:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * thanks for your message, but I encourage you to read Spoiler. Wikipedia is not in the business of deleting spoiler content, so that was not a valid reason to remove that piece of content from that article. As the policy states: "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot. Such concerns must not interfere with neutral point of view, encyclopedic tone, completeness, or any other element of article quality."  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  06:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail

 * Apologies for the delay in responding - I was busy the last couple of days. I see others have already dealt with your request, though. I concur with their actions and their words. I'm sorry. —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  21:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

My first Nomination
Amberrock, I'm trying to do my first DYK nomination on both Bob Hope and Riverside International Raceway, could you give me a hand in getting it fixed so that it can be placed on the main page TIA. Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Hope it's my first time trying this :)

TVSRR (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Worms1 screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Worms1 screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot. KCVelaga (talk) 11:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Body Language .jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Body Language .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

"Retouching" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Retouching. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Communication
Dear Amberrock, Can you kindly get in touch with me on my email skyblue998877665544@gmail.com please? It is rather urgent.

Thank you for your kindness.

Regards, Westminster9876 (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Fuck for Forest (emblem).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fuck for Forest (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orphaned notice
Template:Orphaned notice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TVE Internacional.png
Thank you for uploading File:TVE Internacional.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TVE Internacional.png
Thanks for uploading File:TVE Internacional.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

"Zeekoe" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Zeekoe and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 23:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ltunited-wearethewinners.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Ltunited-wearethewinners.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thescore.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thescore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 00:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Wishmastour 2000 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wishmastour 2000 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wishmastour 2000 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)