User talk:Amberrock/Archive 16


 * The following discussion is an archived talkpage of Amberrock below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on Amberrock's live user talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for DanTDM: Trayaurus and the Enchanted Crystal
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:NLCOTW article


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:NLCOTW article, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't even know anymore what this was for, LOL. Thanks for cleaning up this outdated trash. —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  07:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Help
Could you please look into SubRE's editing history, he is vandalising pages I've created and it all seems fishy, my full real details social networking profiles and phone number will be given to you if asked Asouko (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've looked into it. Now, I will have to disagree with you that SubRE is vandalizing articles you started. He's not: he is nominating them for deletion, which is something entirely else. His concerns seem to be centered around the theme of non-notability. Which is - in most of the cases - not unwarranted. You have responded with comments that do not always contain arguments to keep certain articles, but borderline on ad hominems (here, for example). Therefore: I'm very sorry, but I'm not inclined to interfere with SubRE's behaviour. What he's doing doesn't seem outrageous to me, so I have to apply good faith and say there's not something 'fishy' going on.
 * One thing he's contented and you haven't elaborated on, is that he said that you are a member of Phase (band). Is that true?  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  12:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Warning
So sorry about that, but I didn't use it in a derogatory way. We're I come from ignorant means lack of knowledge on a subject and it's within the limits of political correctness. MusicPatrol (talk) 19:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC) MusicPatrol (talk) 19:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm aware of what ignorant means, and it's generally not a kind term to just toss at somebody because they want an article deleted you would like to keep. Differences of opinion happen, and that doesn't mean the other side is ignorant. But my warning wasn't just for that term: you also said an editor made it "personal" when he was simply citing Wikipedia policy. You told hem "You don't know anything about music" and you strongly implied that said person was not an expert. All of that is uncivil, and seems contrary to WP:AGF.  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  20:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

You are right on the fact that I was a bit harsh, but he would ignore the messages on his talk page and he would have tunnel vision on his thing... It seems that he only hanged around there only to remove that article not even knowing how to use the tags, that simply demonstrated bad faith to me... He would only reply to other editors comments and he would ignore me. And make accusations based on nothing, that I am member and promoter of the band, or whatever. It all started when I would remove one of his tags reasoning it and leaving him a message and then we would play the add  remove game in loop, That's not respectful behaviour either... Anyway I do apologise, and thank you for taking the time to moderate the conversation! I deeply appreciate it. By the way, I didn't imply you don't know what it means, I meant semantics differ from country to country and region to region... All the best MusicPatrol (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC) MusicPatrol (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No offense was taken, because none was given. Good luck with the articles!  —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  20:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Konrad Mizzi) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Konrad Mizzi, Amberrock!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This has been tagged for 2 issues."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK --- link the nomination to the nominations page !?
Hello, I got a message that I have a DYK proposal not connected: Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Bazilije Pandžić at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. (see full message here).

This is my submission: Template:Did you know nominations/Bazilije Pandžić. Can you please help me with step 3. I do not know what to do there. I know better in the German Wikipedia, unfortunately not in the English, where I have published only a few articles. Greets from Germany -- Triplec85 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

.esd listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect .esd. Since you had some involvement with the .esd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nightwish-highhopes.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Nightwish-highhopes.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Over Hills Far Away.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Over Hills Far Away.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Yisrael Beiteinu
Hi Amberrock,

"In the 2009 election the party won 15 seats, its most to date, making it the third largest party in the antepenultimate Knesset". The way I understand this, the antepenultimate Knesset is the 19th Knesset that was formed after the legislative elections of January 2013. That's why, I chose to slightly amend the aforementioned passage. Are we on the same page here? Shams lnm (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

At a second (more diligent) reading, I realized that the antepenultimate phrasing is correct (but, in my opinion, it is a tad confusing as well). Thus, I wrote: “In the 2009 election, the party won 15 seats, its most to date, making it the third largest party in the antepenultimate (i.e., 18th) Knesset”. Do you agree with this adjustment? Cheers, Shams lnm (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm a-okay with you being bold, don't worry! —♦♦ AMBER  (ЯʘCK)  23:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Terrific! Thank you. Amberrock, you rock! Shams lnm (talk) 01:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.