User talk:Amdmustafa/Archive 1

January 2011
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Abhishek191288, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Abhishek191288 (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Coimbatore Airport
Nopes. Please have a look at the following:, ,. Abhishek191288 (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Yup! There aren't any HYD-CJB flights. Thanks for the update. Why so serious?  Talk to me 06:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Salem Airport (India). Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Why so serious? Talk to me 10:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Help
Hi, seeing your username I believe you might know Urdu. If yes could you please write the urdu title for Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. Thanks, Why so serious?  Talk to me 10:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It is not translation of the page but only the title: Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. I just want the translation of this title to Urdu (not the article). Thanks, Why so serious?  Talk to me 11:37, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Help on editing
✅ I have merged the references per your request. Why so serious? Talk to me 08:40, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle
Hi, I see that you are really doing good work here. Why don't you use Twinkle. It's an effective tool to revert edits. If you have two or more different people who have added any wrong info, you can revert to the last good edit by using twinkle. Just go through the link I have given above for twinkle, if you like it, start using it. Happy editing! . &mdash; Why so serious? Talk to me 02:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Tiruchirapalli Airport
In your revert here you mentioned that another ref is not required. But there is nothing wrong in mentioning another ref as long as it is verifiable and reliable. Cheers! &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 16:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk  06:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Removal of Speculation
Some article are removed from "Madurai Airport" page because of too much speculation without source.Citation needed is must — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selva chess (talk • contribs) 19:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 18:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 16:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Please have a look
Hi. Please have a look at this. Users of this forum, are commenting about you. I suspect meatpuppetry here. If you also think the same, feel free to take it to WP:ANI. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 17:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 06:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 08:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 05:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Madurai Airport. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 04:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * It seems from this that the IP also happened to be you. Please be aware of wikipedia's sockpuppetry policies. Socking is frowned upon. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 05:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It was not intentional. I forgot to sign in. I am aware of sock puppetry.

SpiceJet
Hi there,I have the reference which says That Spice Jet operates daily flights to Sharjah and Delhi. See this reference- http://www.spicejet.com/Schedules.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devesh 4-2-2000 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Lucknow Airport
Hi,Do you know that IndiGo operates 3Times daily flight from Lucknow to Goa?So I m adding it in IndiGo's list. Thank. You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devesh 4-2-2000 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

SpiceJet
G'day from Oz; what's going on? You changed the fleet table to show 42 aircraft without any source to back the information up. You did not change the fleet total in the infobox. I changed the infobox total to match what you had done and added Cite Needed tags because your change was unreferenced, then you undid my edit, saying Planespotters is out-of-date when it wasn't even used as a source, then you added Planespotters. Why?? YSSYguy (talk) 07:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I do not question the accuracy of what you say, which is why I changed the infobox fleet total to 42 instead of changing the fleet table back to 38 again. However, in Wikipedia world we need references, which is why I added the Cite Needed tags, especially when an existing reference says something different. I misunderstood your first edit summary as well, I took it to mean "company's webpage on Planespotters", not "company's website fleet page". Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * May I know why planespotters.net and FR24 are not considered as proper reference, especially when company website is outdated? --Amdmustafa (talk) 09:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no opinion about Flightradar myself, but it and Planespotters are considered not to be reliable sources, because they rely on information from people like me and you, who contact them to say things like "hey, B73G VT-XYZ is still flying with SpiceJet". I tried searching FR24 a couple of months ago for an aircraft that I had seen and photographed on final approach at an airport at sunset, and could not find any flight history for several registrations for that particular airline. As to PS, I think it is better than CH-aviation, but still sometimes I find it is wrong for certain airlines in terms of fleet numbers. YSSYguy (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: SPI
Hi, Amdmustafa - I hope that you're well. Just wanted to suggest that when filing SPI cases, it's a good idea to check whether the listed master is, in fact, a sockpuppet of another master. In Sockpuppet investigations/Nprasanna, Nprasanna had been blocked and tagged as a sock of. In that case, it's best to file the case under the older master (Itskumudhk). I hope to see you around SPI in the future. Thanks, GABgab 18:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * @GAB, Sure. Initially I thought to file under older master, but I'm unable to find evidence from master's work as most of it was deleted. Hence I took evidence of N prasanna and filed under his name. Kindly guide me how to file evidence of master if I'm unable to find it. The very reason why I'm asking is he keeps creating new account in different name and do the same vandalism in Tiruchirapalli International Airport Amdmustafa (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem - there's no one, guaranteed way of determining, but there are techniques to make it easier. One easy way is to check the userpage to see if there's a socktag, meaning that that account has already been blocked as somebody's sock. Another way is to go to "preferences" at the top of your screen, click "gadgets," and then check the box reading, "Strike out usernames that have been blocked." If you see another blocked editor in an article history, and especially if that account has been socktagged, that can help you determine. To file under an older master, all you need to do is expand the "How to open an investigation" box at SPI, enter in the master's username, click "submit," and then fill out the information, as necessary. If you have twinkle (highly recommended), there's a handy form under "ARV" that will aid you in submitting reports. I hope that this helps. GABgab 21:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent editing history at Madurai Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr \ talk / 07:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 12:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)