User talk:Amdyrowlands

Leonardo
Thanks for your edits to the Leonardo page, which were all pertinent to the subject, but belong on a different page: Science and inventions of Leonardo da Vinci. Would you mind making the additions there?

A problem with the Leonardo da Vinci main article is that a million things could be said there, but it is already so large that it is very slow to load. Since Leonardo was primarily famous as a painter, this is the focus of the main article, and the reason for the second one on his science.

Also, when you add info, you must take into account how it affects the information around it. There was a "shortlist" of anatomical features that Leonardo drew, "heart, sex organs, etc etc, ...." into which you inserted much more detail that pertained only to the heart, but then left the list, beginning with a comma followed by "sex organs" which had nothing to do with what you had written and turned what followed into nonsense.

If you are going to add a substantial amount of info, the correct approach would have been to restructure the entire sentence into two, one sentence about the heart and the second stating "He also drew anatomical studies of the sex organs..... etc etc"

Amandajm (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please help!!**** I've just read your comments here, and I didnt know there were more than one page about Leonardo. I can easily add my comments to the other page if you think it's more relevant there. I can't see any way to contact you to reply to your question other than by adding my reply here, so I hope you see this message. If you wish to contact me direct, my email is amr26@blueyonder.co.uk. By the way, my name is Andy not Amdy, when I created my 'account' I spelled my name wrong!

October 2012
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Class of 1984, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Donagio, I looked at your talk page, but I can see nowhere to add any comment, so I have no choice but to add it here. I watched the film and added what I consider to be an important piece of information. I did not add any 'reliable source' as I don't know of any such thing. My information comes from watching the film. If I add it again, you will presumably remove it, so I guess it will have to remain as it is. If you wish to discuss this further, please contact me on amr26@blueyonder.co.uk

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=589213945 your edit] to British Rail Class 56 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (which was to become 56313) is also owned by BARS. In December 2013 it was moved from Wansford Nene Valley Railway to their facility at Washwood Heath for evaluation for a possible mainline