User talk:AmeerAssadi


 * But you did use your page for advertising. I can't view the page anymore, but it was absolutely promotional when I saw it. I also recommend that you don't ask to be unblocked while the other notice is still pending on the page; this is considered bad form and usually doesn't get accepted. Please review WP:UNBLOCK to explain why you were blocked and how to properly appeal it. And remember that Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, and telling people to go to your website/YouTube channel counts as promotion. MereTechnicality (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * If what you posted didn't strike you as being advertising or promotion, I'm afraid you wouldn't last long here. Look at other articles, and how they are worded. Peridon (talk) 18:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I've renamed your account, but I don't feel I can unblock you right now after having had a look at the now-deleted Prankpedia article you wrote. It was written purely in promotional marketing speak, and if you can't see the problem with that then you might not be suited to editing here - as Peridon suggested, above. PranksPedia.com also does not look like it has the notability required for a Wikipedia article, and so I suspect you're unlikely to find an admin willing to unblock unless you agree not to write about PranksPedia.com, and also explain what you would do instead if unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:PranksPedia


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:PranksPedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MereTechnicality (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prankpedia


A tag has been placed on Prankpedia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MereTechnicality (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Prankpedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. MereTechnicality (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)