User talk:Amer.sulaiman

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Khaled Juffali, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello ,

I’m working with Shaikh Khaled in his company as an IT and social media manager, And the figures of his networth is completely incorrect, thats why I’m removing it, to avoid publishing mesleading information,

So please I’m asking you to not restore the information,

Thanks for you understanding, Amer.sulaiman (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello Amer.sulaiman. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Khaled Juffali, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amer.sulaiman. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Cordless Larry , Thanks for concerns , But I want to make sure to you that I'm not receiving any direct or indirect payments to do my edits, It's just to update the incorrect information that was published in this articul, And to avoid publishing mesleading information. And if you need any more information I will be more than happy to provide it to you. Thanks for your understanding. Amer.sulaiman (talk) 08:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Above, you write that you're the subject's social media manager. That suggests that you are being paid for these contributions. In any case, you clearly have a conflict of interest, so rather than editing directly, please follow the instructions at WP:COIREQ if you want any further changes made to the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes I'm the social media manager as I said in previous talk and I prefered to say the truth becuse there is nothing wrong with removing incorrect misleading information. And that doesn't mean that I'm receiving payments to change the article and if you notice that I never added any new information to the article, I just removed what I'm sure it's incorrect information based on what I know. But you are right, I may have conflict of interest so I prefer to not do any edits or updates in the future if it's not allowed by Wikipedia terms. So kindly remove the "Investigation of potential copyright issue" section from the article. Or advice me what to do in order to remove it.

Thanks. Amer.sulaiman (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The copyright investigation notice needs to remain there until the offending text has been removed from the article's history by an admin, I'm afraid. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry but what is the offending text that need to be removed ? Please advice. Amer.sulaiman (talk) 10:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * See here. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:30, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

There is no copyright issue here , The help center was founded by Ahmed Juffali ( Khaled’s father) as it’s clearly mentioned in thier website. And he is now managing this center. Please let me know what to do to remove this copyright investigation. Amer.sulaiman (talk) 11:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The website has a copyright notice on it, whereas text submitted to Wikipedia is released under a CC BY-SA 3.0 licence, so there's a clear incompatibility there. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your editing the Article looks better now, but why you removed the languages part ? Amer.sulaiman (talk) 12:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)