User talk:AmericanLawExpert

History of Hawaii
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Viriditas (talk) 09:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Text follows:

"However, the United States did not include an option for idependence on the voting ballots which is required by international law. The United States government also allowed the occupying military population to vote in the Statehood vote which is illegal by international law and U.S. constitutional law. The State of Hawai'i owns no land in the Hawaiian Islands as it still belongs to the Hawaiian Kingdom which is known as 'Crown Lands.' The United States Supreme court ruled on Feb. 26, 2009 that the State of Hawai'i does not have the right to sell or transfer these lands."
 * This might be 100% true, however we have had serious problems with editors on both sides of the issue adding unsourced content. Please add this back in with reliable sources.  Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Crown land
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Viriditas (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

User name
FYI...I know you are a new user, but you may want to read Username policy and choose a better user name. There's sort of an unwritten law on Wikipedia: Whenever an editor describes themselves as an "expert" in their user name, there's a good chance that they aren't. Sort of like, those who can do, those who can't...  It's the same thing with discussions. If an editor is reduced to appealing to their academic degree, then there's obviously something wrong with their argument. In any case, you probably don't want people to get the wrong impression, so I recommend coming up with another user name. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 09:52, 1 March 2009 (UTC)