User talk:Amgisseman(BYU)

List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs
Hi, I notice that you've been producing a lot of DYKs lately. You may want to add your name to the creations and expansions list at List of Wikipedians by number of DYKs and keep track of your DYK credits there. You get an award for your first 25 credits! Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Here's some resource tools
You might be interested in all the various source subscriptions available through Wikipedia. See navbox below. Many, if not all, have requirements such as a Wikipedia account at least 6 months old (but, hey, you've already been here 4 months), and a minimum number of edits. I say pick out whichever ones you think would help your particular field of interest and apply as soon as you qualify. Good luck with future articles. And may you eventually never have any sourcing snags in any level of reviews. — Maile (talk) 19:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Warren Angus Ferris
Hello! Your submission of Warren Angus Ferris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Warren Angus Ferris
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Merian C. Cooper
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Merian C. Cooper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Merian C. Cooper
The article Merian C. Cooper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Merian C. Cooper for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Merian C. Cooper
The article Merian C. Cooper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Merian C. Cooper for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RL0919 -- RL0919 (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karl G. Maeser
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Karl G. Maeser you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Karl G. Maeser
The article Karl G. Maeser you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Karl G. Maeser for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Karl G. Maeser
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Just because! hehe. Go look at my talk page and you will know why... haha. :D Phelps (BYU) (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LeahWidtsoeedited.png
 Thanks for uploading File:LeahWidtsoeedited.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:LeahWidtsoeedited.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LeahWidtsoeedited.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Amy B. Lyman bibliography for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy B. Lyman bibliography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amy B. Lyman bibliography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 06:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)