User talk:Amichael1980

New article
A title like Erkers Optical official photographer of the 1904 World's Fair doesn't make too much sense, so I have moved the content to Erker's Optical. That article still needs lots of work. Please see WP:WIKIFY. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Erker's Optical
I have nominated Erker's Optical, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Erker's Optical. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Erker's Optical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erker's Optical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erker's Optical (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Erker's Optical for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erker's Optical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Erker's Optical& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtherSRG (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)