User talk:AminMDMA

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

your course
Hi Amin! I just wanted to apologize for the problem with your course page. It should be all set and working now at Education Program:University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)/Expanding WikiProject Medicine (April 2014). The way that the course pages handle changes of course name and title is very buggy, and we are going to disable it altogether soon. In short, you successfully changed the name of your course, and the message about it having been deleted is not correct (since it really just got moved), so when you tried to undelete it you got an error because the ID number for your course was actually still active. Thanks for uncovering a new bug for us!--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

You have not completed the student training.
Please complete the student training. If you have already gone through it, be sure to click the button at the end to record that you finished it. --AminMDMA 06:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Amin
Question --AminMDMA 23:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:AminMDMA/Western group on educational affairs
User:AminMDMA/Western group on educational affairs, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AminMDMA/Western group on educational affairs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:AminMDMA/Western group on educational affairs during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 03:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Courses Modules are being deprecated
Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Education noticeboard/Archive 18.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishi Desai


A tag has been placed on Rishi Desai, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.acehp.org/page/industry-summit---agenda. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rishi Desai


The article Rishi Desai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Rishi Desai moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rishi Desai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishi Desai (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rishi Desai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rishi Desai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rishi_Desai Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rishi_Desai reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liancetalk/contribs 00:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Penicillin. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use your sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Graham 87 05:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Honestly, editing somewhere like Draft:Sandbox would have been better. Or somewhere in your userspace ... Graham 87 05:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rishi Desai


Hello, AminMDMA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rishi Desai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Student editing
I understand that you are the instructor for students in this class. Quite a few of them have been rewriting their articles to remove any reference to men or women, adding phrases like "people with uteruses" and "people with testes", despite the fact that these articles' sources speak only of "men" or "women" and are not about transgender people at all. They should not be doing this in this or any other class and should instead be following the sources. This is per WP:V and WP:DUE. This is also per near-unanimous community consensus at Village pump (proposals)/Archive 161, where the closure states, As outlined below, the terminology in articles, especially medical articles, is dependent upon the support of reliable sources and it is expected that editors would use the same terminology presented in said sources. WP:GNL makes a similar point. Finally, such phrases are confusing to people who do not speak English well - a large proportion of our readers - who may not know what those technical anatomical terms mean. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 03:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Crossroads thank you for your communication. As you may already know, these are medical students enrolled in a course at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine. This 2021-22 academic year is the first year we are attempting to "scale up" the historical Wikipedia-editing course from an elective-only course (n = 5 - 37 students) to the ENTIRE enrolled cohort (n = 160). Of course this kind of expansion will inevitably result in several students not quite knowing the Wikipedia community well (yet). They will learn. And I also acknowledge that the UCSF community likes to be at the forefront of social change by encouraging healthcare to advance human inclusion. A parallel process is seen with the use of pronouns. First there was merely biological constructs. Then the term "preferred pronouns." Then "pronouns." Sadly the peer-reviewed health professional literature moves at a slower pace than human social constructs (and at times slower than Wikipedia moves). I agree we need to encourage our students to be citing secondary sources and using terminology that is valid, peer-reviewed, and citable. And also that together we Wikipedians can advance the dissemination of the evolution of the human process of understanding the limits of both science, and Wikipedia! Respectfully submitted. AminMDMA (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It sounds like we agree that students should be using the terminology that the sources use, even though that means saying "woman" or "man". Regarding being "at the forefront of social change", it is not permitted for students to use Wikipedia for the purpose of catalyzing social change or as the vanguard of language-reform. Wikipedia has a policy titled WP:NOTADVOCACY. It is not to be used to WP:Right great wrongs.
 * Since so many of the students did this, can you please clarify for me if they were told by an instructor or other authority to use this new terminology? And who told them if so? Or was it really spontaneous that most students who edited sex-specific topics did this? If it was spontaneous, it would be much appreciated if future classes were told to use the terms found in the sources regardless of their feelings about them. That would save other editors a lot of time. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 04:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Unannounced student project?
Hello, I've encountered someone claiming to be a student of an Amin Azzam, and saying that we should search Wikipedia to find out who that person is. The Wikipedia page Amin Azzam led me to your talk page. Is this a class project that you're currently running? Belbury (talk) 09:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reaching out about this. Indeed this is a course, but it is not sponsored by Wiki Education. Instead, it is through the wmflabs dashboard, since it is at a medical school in India. You can find the details of this course at the dashboard here:
 * Though I have certainly reviewed Wikipedia’s core pillars and discussed sandbox editing with them, I will remind enrolled students about civil discourse between Wikipedians and the need to ensure they cite sources properly, paraphrase sufficiently when writing, etc. In reading your dialogue with this student, I think there was some misunderstanding with written English since that is not this student’s native tongue. In any case it is always important to dialogue respectfully, and I appreciate that about your post. Thanks again. AminMDMA (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Please do apply clear Educational assignment templates to articles that you've instructed your students to edit, there's been some confusion with null templates being added and responses then blanked by a student of yours at Talk:Breast cancer. Belbury (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

About global account blocking
Hello sir, hope you remember me...

As we were working on our wikiproject assignment there has come a huge problem now, till now only edits were removed but recently many of the accounts of my batchmates have been globally blocked for indefinite time

And the reason and the problems interelated to these matter can be viewed here. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I have written to Arjayay at that same place explaining that you are all medical students engaged in this task as an assignment in school. I'm sorry this is happening. I suspect it is because there are so many of you contributing all of a sudden and many are using the same med school textbook as your source. I hope that my writing will help these Wikipedians to unblock your accounts so you can continue contributing. In the meantime you can continue writing in your sandbox(es) so that whenever you're unblocked you can copy over all your improvements. Please share this with your batchmates. AminMDMA (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)