User talk:Amir.azhieh

December 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page René Higuita has been reverted. Your edit here to René Higuita was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH9nh88BDLw|the) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Please review WP:OVERLINK. It is not helpful to link common English words, like "inlet" or country and state place names like "Canada" and "Ontario".  Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Thermodynamic free energy does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Adagio appassionato for violin and orchestra
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Amir.azhieh, thanks for creating Adagio appassionato for violin and orchestra!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This may be able to be developed but at the moment it isn't ready for mainspace. Can you please move it back to the mainspace when it's ready? Thanks for your work on this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of I. Robert Lehman
Hello, Amir.azhieh. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, I. Robert Lehman, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want I. Robert Lehman to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

—  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 12:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:MEDMOS
Per ordering of sections. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Concertino for Clarinet (Donizetti) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Concertino for Clarinet (Donizetti), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Allweneedisloveandpeace (talk) 12:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Adagio appassionato for violin and orchestra


Hello, Amir.azhieh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Adagio appassionato for violin and orchestra.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dudley Williams (biological chemist)
Hello, Amir.azhieh,

Thank you for creating Dudley Williams (biological chemist).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"if you're genuinely "enamored of science", please return to this stub and do the man credit by utilising the really good content in the bare URL reference you cited. It'd be a shame to leave it incomplete, or expect others to do it for you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 06:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeremy Sanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dudley Williams ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jeremy_Sanders check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jeremy_Sanders?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Concertino for Clarinet (Donizetti) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Concertino for Clarinet (Donizetti), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Concertino for Clarinet (Donizetti)


Hello, Amir.azhieh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concertino for Clarinet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:22, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

some advice
Although John Mekalanos is unquestionably notable according to WP:PROF because of his membership in the US NAS, it's generally considered here that it is not particularly helpful to enter articles with as little information as this base upon inclusion in a list and nothing more. For one thing, people who might not know the standards in the subject field might well nominate it, however wrongly, fo deletion, The ref. you cited links ultimately to, his web page at Harvard, which gives other information. To discuss his research, the best and most objective way is to list his 5 or so most cited papers from Google Scholar, including the number of citations. I'm one of the editors who work regularly on academic bios, and if you need any assistance, ask me on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nature Food


The article Nature Food has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced, brand new, non-notable journal."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nature Cancer


The article Nature Cancer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced, brand new non-notable publication."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Nature Food for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nature Food is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nature Food until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Nature Cancer moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nature Cancer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 16:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Scott J. Hultgren moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Scott J. Hultgren, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 18:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott J. Hultgren (March 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott J. Hultgren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scott J. Hultgren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scott_J._Hultgren Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Scott_J._Hultgren reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I believe that this scientist meets the notability guidelines of academics as in the criteria discussed in the source just mentioned, the person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). In this case, Scott Hultgren has been appointed to the National Academy of Sciences and as many other articles that I have so far created, e.g. those on Philip Hieter, John Mekalanos, as well as I. Robert Lehman, this biography would be on a typical important scientist on Wikipedia. I would appreciate it if you could accept it on those grounds. Amir.azhieh (talk) 02:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott J. Hultgren has been accepted
 Scott J. Hultgren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! KylieTastic (talk) 19:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Scott_J._Hultgren help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Amir.azhieh

Thank you for creating STAC3.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Flute Concerto in C major (Stamitz) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Flute Concerto in C major (Stamitz), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Nature Cancer concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nature Cancer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Nature Cancer concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nature Cancer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diana Adamyan


A tag has been placed on Diana Adamyan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. IMani → (Talk) :) 04:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dana Carroll
Hello, Amir.azhieh,

Thank you for creating Dana Carroll.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This person is probably notable, based on National Academy membership, but it is obviously extremely brief, and needs a lot more added to it for it to be really useful."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PopePompus (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dana Carroll
Hello, Amir.azhieh,

Thank you for creating Dana Carroll.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"There's almost no info here. Maybe start by adding an infobx?"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PopePompus (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Flute Concerto in C major (Stamitz)


Hello, Amir.azhieh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flute Concerto in C major".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nature Cancer


Hello, Amir.azhieh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nature Cancer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2023 Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Max Blumenthal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jeppiz (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)