User talk:AmirahBreen/Archive 1

Request Help
I see you created an RFC on neutrality, and just did something similar, so I was hoping you could double check that  THIS goes through without interference. Thank you.24.78.228.96 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Reintroducing "but he refuses to step down" against consensus
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 14:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * To the contrary, the wording was removed on the grounds of inadequate referencing and I provided a new reference in order to solve this. My edit was removed again, stating that a consensus had been reached. There has been no discussion about it on the article talk page, so how could a consensus have been reached? Also, I have tried to start discussions over content before on the talk page, and despite there being very little participation by other users, I have been accused of bludgeoning the talk page for it. This has made me feel unwelcome to participate in or contribute to talk page discussions as your behaviour against me is continuing and you have used my willingness to enter into discussion on the talk page before editing the article against me.  Amirah   talk  14:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Including myself, there are at least three editors who have removed "refused to step down" from the lede. Your most recent restoration used the same ref as this one. You clearly don't have a consensus for that wording, regardless of whether or not there is a section dedicated to it on the talk page. You're already treading on thin ice. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have opened a discussion on the article talk page hoping to work toward a consensus. Amirah   talk  02:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)