User talk:Amit.singh97733

Exchange4media
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Apart from the history, the text is largely unreferenced, and there appears to be no data such as profits, turnover or number of employees to show how it meets the notability criteria linked above.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: aim for creating quality publications... It has been widely regarded as one of the most credible destinations for news and views, whether for breaking stories, exclusive features and interviews or industry opinion pieces... It publishes perceptive, in-depth reports... a valuable source of reference, features, industry events and news for today's advertising and marketing professionals... It engages an audience of leaders, trendsetters and opinion makers... offers insightful perspectives and points of view on key happenings.&mdash; and so on, just spam really
 * The article was a copyright violation of this page. Although the words have been moved around, a close paraphrase is still a violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The page is clearly tagged  © 2014 Carnegie Mellon University. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)