User talk:Amitabh2

Speedy deletion nomination of Boxofficeindia.com


A tag has been placed on Boxofficeindia.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 18:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Boxofficeindia.com
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Boxofficeindia.com, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.boxofficeindia.com/cpages.php?pageName=about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 10:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Your addition to Boxofficeindia.com has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boxofficeindia.com


A tag has been placed on Boxofficeindia.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 19:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh My God (2012 film)
you are hell bent on inserting "OMG Oh My God is Akshay Kumar's 116th film" in the lead section which is not appropriate there .If it be 100th ,then it make sense. ---zeeyanketu talk to me 16:03, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

concensus?
Where are these discussions that you speak of for Enthiran and Ra.One? BollyJeff &#124;  talk  16:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, even I would like to know where this "day-long" discussion took place. Until proof can be shown, I am reverting the edit. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Your recent editing history at Ra.One shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''Stop this. You should start a discussion and reach a concensus before making edits, or I report you to the admins for sure.'' --Plea$ant 1623  ✉  15:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boxofficeindia.com


A tag has been placed on Boxofficeindia.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Jab Tak Hai Jaan
The views of INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTORS are important in the Ajay Notice Scandal. I added the name of a prominent distributor. Hopefully now you will let the article be as your concern has been addressed. I know you're an Ajay fan but the views of distrutors are important. If you find a RS quote from another distrubtuor do put it up. Thanks! Happy Editing! On a sidenote, deleting quotes like that just because they are againt your favorite actor is considered vandalism. But I'll let that slide. Ashermadan (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is your last warning. Do not vandalize the JTHJ page anymore. Ashermadan (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been reported for vandalism. Ashermadan (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent abuse of multiple accounts, evading blocks on several accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)