User talk:Amitabhilash

Rajneesh Kapoor
Hi there. Rajneesh Kapoor would have to be one of the worst-ever contributions towards Wikipedia that is a blatant self-promotion of Kapoor. May I please suggest that in future you create the article in your sandbox and when you feel it is ready for posting, submit the article for review WP:AfC and an experienced editor will review the article and provide you feedback directly. If they feel it is good enough for posting to Wikipedia, they will do so under your name. Otherwise, they will ask you to revise the article. That way Wikipedia does not get choked with poor-quality articles like you have submitted with Kappor. I invite you to review the article from a more objective approach. Thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 13:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
Hello Amitabhilash. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amitabhilash. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Response

I solemnly declare that there is no compensation/pay in any form attached with the article. The article has been constituted to inform and hence is not be construed as promotion of any kind. With greatest of respect to all Wikipedia contributors - Amit
 * So, what is your relationship with Doctor Kapoor? Are you an employee, associate, friend or what? For example, how did you know his date of birth, details of his education and family life? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Information taken is from sources & personal interview. My relationship is that of writer with his subject. I write on subjects who holds stakes in human life ( passion and not profession )

Deletion discussion about Rajneesh Kapoor
Hello, Amitabhilash,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rajneesh Kapoor should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Articles for deletion/Rajneesh Kapoor.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I beg to differ on opinion to delete the page. The reason being that it contains information on medical practitioners, information which is vital for public domains. Such articles need to be made more intense with content and contributions from all is the best way out. With a passion to keep people informed, especially on matters & people that influence life , I seek your inputs into the article that makes it more informative. Lets together build a more informed society, together.

January 2019
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajneesh Kapoor, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi
Ok. I truly believe issues must be resolved. I left a reply on issues mentioned for COI but I feel more inputs are required. It stays till all queries resolved to satisfaction to all. Amit Amitabhilash (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating Wikipedia's terms of use by engaging in undisclosed paid editing and using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.