User talk:Amitchell125/Archive 11

osbert parsley
Amitchell125, i had a few questions regarding this blurb for this article. dying (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * was done in error?  i admittedly cannot figure out what was wrong with the edit, as i try to only make what i believe are uncontroversial edits to tfa blurbs, preferring to address fac nominators directly regarding issues that may be less clear (such as the two points below).  many similar changes are routinely made to tfa blurbs to conform each to the current standard.  aside from the routine changes, i had also reworded one sentence because i believe it was missing a main verb, which seems like a particularly obvious error.  (the fragment had been part of a longer sentence in the article lead.)  if your reversion was, in fact, deliberate, please let me know your reasoning, so that i may be more aware of similar issues in the future.
 * is "Spes Nostra" being used as a title, or only as an incipit? if the latter, then i believe the `N' should not be capitalized, as per mos:incipit, to conform with the capitalization used in "Conserva me, domine", as seen earlier in the blurb.  the article appears to be inconsistent regarding how it should be capitalized.  the description in the cited british library source does not seem to mention the motet, though the diamm entry cited elsewhere in the article does mention it, and does not capitalize the 'n'.
 * is the "domine" in "Conserva me, domine" being used as either a proper name referencing a deity, or a title doing the same? if so, then i believe the `d should be capitalized, as per mos:god, even though sentence case is being used.  the aforementioned diamm entry capitalizes the 'D', though the cited odnb entry does not.  (incidentally, the article also mentions "a hymn Salvator mundi domine" with a minuscule `d, citing the same diamm entry, though both the diamm and the odnb omit "domine" from the reference to the hymn.)

Thank you today for the article "about the English composer, organist and 'singing man' Osbert Parsley, whose 50-year-long musical career at Norwich Cathedral spanned the reigns of four Tudor monarchs—Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary, and Elizabeth." I am pleased to see a "singing man" exposed prominently! - I began songs, to grow. -- "singing woman" Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought you would spot this article! His music is rather good... Amitchell125 (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, I was looking forward after I reviewed in the FAC ;) - I mentioned "him" in the Debussy discussion. - I just added my first choir's plans to the "happy new year": quite promising! We - Chor St. Martin - celebrate 50 years in 2023, and 26 of them were with me, beginning with the St Matthew Passion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm on vacation, - click on songs! I tell my own stories now, instead of relying on DYK. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * back - Melitta Muszely died, RIP - the other story is 10 years old OTD ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Artemy Vedel scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 February 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/February 6, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine S.4
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supermarine S.4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Amitchell125!


Happy New Year! Amitchell125, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Isaac Sailmaker
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine S.4
The article Supermarine S.4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine S.4 for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine S.4/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

AfD of interest
Hello, I thought (per WP:APPNOTE) that you might be interested in an AfD that concerns an article that you participated in previous discussions about: namely, Skathi (moon), for which you did a GA review. You can find the deletion discussion here. - Astrophobe  (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of bibliographical materials on Ukrainian music


Hello, Amitchell125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of bibliographical materials on Ukrainian music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Sparrow
The article Supermarine Sparrow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Supermarine Sparrow and Talk:Supermarine Sparrow/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Sparrow
The article Supermarine Sparrow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine Sparrow for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine Sparrow/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Gloucester (1654)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for R. J. Mitchell
Vanamonde 12:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Did I overlook?...
Hi Amitchell. Hope you are doing well. Did I miss something here? Please don't hesitate to let me know, and I'll self-revert as soon as possible. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Supermarine S.4
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Question
Now that all the points raised by you in the review of Adullam have been addressed (see here), in an effort to make the article worthy of GA status, is it necessary for me to re-nominate the article for GA status, or is this an automatic, ongoing process?Davidbena (talk) 19:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,, that's right, the article needs to be re-nominated. I do not reassess an article that I have failed, but I'm sure when you re-nominate it, it will find another reviewer before too long. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This will give me a little more time to work on the article's improvement. Your suggested areas of improvement have been helpful. Again, thanks!Davidbena (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Zodiac Suite GA
Hey - not sure if I wasn't clear or you're busy at the moment but I've done all the updates I think I need for you to follow up on the GA review for Zodiac Suite. Many thanks. Vladimir.copic (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * thanks, I'll get on this in the next day or two..Amitchell125 (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries - God knows I took long enough! Vladimir.copic (talk) 22:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

February songs
yesterday's cantata, 300 years later --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

today's stories are about two pieces we sang at church, today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

... and today the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

... and today I feature your composer Artemy Vedel (TFA), "a Ukrainian composer, little known outside his own country, who composed mainly liturgical works based on Ukrainian folk melodies, and who made an important contribution in the music history of Ukraine." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Coincidence: I expanded Psalm 79 today, and see that Vedel composed a choral concerto. Can you tell me which reference I could use for it? ... and for the other psalms he set? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:54, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Nevermind, I found it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Well done on finding the reference! Amitchell125 (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Praise Google: I saw it and searched for Psalm 79, and it wasn't there, and sent Google on the search for the composer and the psalm, and arrived at the same page, and then found it by the first line in English! I added it now to Psalms 79, 137 and 142. --
 * today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Battani
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Al-Battani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wihtburh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ely.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Battani
The article Al-Battani you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Al-Battani and Talk:Al-Battani/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Battani
The article Al-Battani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Al-Battani for comments about the article, and Talk:Al-Battani/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 13:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wihtburh
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wihtburh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Julian's Church, Norwich
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article St Julian's Church, Norwich you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Julian's Church, Norwich
The article St Julian's Church, Norwich you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:St Julian's Church, Norwich and Talk:St Julian's Church, Norwich/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Battani
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wihtburh
The article Wihtburh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wihtburh for comments about the article, and Talk:Wihtburh/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St Julian's Church, Norwich
The article St Julian's Church, Norwich you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:St Julian's Church, Norwich for comments about the article, and Talk:St Julian's Church, Norwich/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 07:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

thank you! - sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 25 March with ups and downs and two cats --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Julian of Norwich scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 8 May 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/May 8, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Looking forwards to that - today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner, who's going to conduct on 6 May. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

K2-18b
Greetings,

can I ask you to take a quick glance at K2-18b to see if some of the problems you noted in the GAN have been resolved? I've taken a stab at improving the linking, prose and footnoting some terms that weren't explained, but I am not sure where on the spectrum "only need some minor work"-"needs a total rewrite still" it falls. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there, it's considered the job of the next reviewer to check that the previous GAN comments are addressed (WP:GAFAIL), so I wouldn't usually be involved in giving you the feedback you have asked for. However, I had a quick look, and it appears some of the easier-to-sort comments for the lead section have not yet been addressed.


 * A good reviewer will carefully check that all the previous GAN comments have all been addressed, and will quick fail the article if they haven't been, so it's worth you spending time on GA1 before re-nominating it. Amitchell125 (talk) 09:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess my thing is I don't agree with some of the proposed fixes e.g I don't think that mass requires a link per WP:OVERLINK. I guess that's more an issue with the GA template though - I don't see a place for a nominator to comment on a quickfailed item. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, mass is linked in the infobox and so I would link it elsewhere, but my point is that the GA1 review is now considered out of my hands. Have you considered seeking a second opinion for the review? Amitchell125 (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No, because I only disagree with one or two points, not with the entire review. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, I would go through with my changes if you want to re-nominate, then discuss them at some point with the the next reviewer, with a review to reverting any you are both not happy about. Good luck! Amitchell125 (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banū Mūsā brothers
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Banū Mūsā brothers you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for St Julian's Church, Norwich
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banū Mūsā brothers
The article Banū Mūsā brothers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Banū Mūsā brothers for comments about the article, and Talk:Banū Mūsā brothers/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Banū Mūsā depicted on a 1996 Syrian stamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Banū Mūsā depicted on a 1996 Syrian stamp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Charles III
Hello, Amitchell125. I recently nominated Charles III for a GA review. If you're interested, you're welcome to review it. Regards, Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That's kind of you Tim. I'll take a look. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, I've looked the work involved, and whether I am up for doing the review. It's big article, and will take time to check. At present I have 3 GANs on the go (an American nut factory, an inventor of a language, and an illegitimate duke), as well as 2 tricky map requests, and my own FA candidate. I'm busy! However, I'll work on fixing as much of the above as I can, and come back to you in a few days' time. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I understand that you have a big workload at the moment. Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 17:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have decided not to review the article, it's much bigger and more complicated than the articles I usually work on. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok. Cheers, Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Igor Grechanyk
Hello, Amitchell125. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Igor Grechanyk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

julian of norwich
Amitchell125, i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. how do we know that julian preferred to write anonymously? the blurb and article lead both mention this, though i was admittedly unable to find mention of this in the article body, so i am not sure which source asserted this. the only known surviving work of hers, revelations of divine love, does not appear to have been published anonymously, and i imagine that it would have likely been difficult for her to hide her authorship of the text if she had preferred to write anonymously. it is possible that she had written many other texts and released them anonymously, but the featured article did not give me that impression. dying (talk) 18:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, Julian's writings were unpublished in her lifetime. None of the surviving manuscripts of her writings, all of which are copies produced by scribes, mention her name, other that one where the scribe has made his/her own note of the identity of the author. Julian definitely wrote anonymously, in that she never revealed her name. In addition, Revelations was published many years after her death, using the name she was known by when alive, but which may not have been her actual name. Hope this helps. Amitchell125 (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * oh, that is interesting. come to think of it, i have also written a good number of things that have never been published and do not have my name on them, but admittedly, it had not previously occurred to me that i could be described as someone who preferred to write anonymously.  thanks for the insight!  dying (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2021): "This article is about Julian, one of England's most important mystics. In May 1373 Julian completely recovered from a serious illness that had caused her to have revelations (or shewings), all of which she went on to describe in detail. Her writings are now published as Revelations of Divine Love, the earliest known book in English to be written by a woman. I would be great if her article was to be promoted before the 650th anniversary of her revelations, in 2023."! And it happened! - On a smaller scale: yesterday and the day before I sang an unusual concert, in ecumenical and international collaboration, the first day with a large group of private company listening, and the second day the chance to talk to the composer afterwards who praised the performance but was quite critical of his piece ;) - Congratulations also to the new FA below! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Many thanks, and Happy Julian of Norwich Day! Amitchell125 (talk) 06:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I just uploaded the pic of three conductors talking, the left is my conductor, in the middle the composer, and right a former conductor (with my other choir). The church article has two more pics of the occasion, one with the soloists and conductors, one with the composer acknowledging the performers in front of a full-house standing ovation - this was the first concert after the pandemic, postponed since 2020 when the city-partnership to Belgium was 50 years old. If you have a chance to hear Helena Rüegg play bandoneon take it, - such an inspiration! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Supermarine S.4
I had a good story on coronation day: a Te Deum we sang that day. And the following day we sang it for the composer ;) - And today we remember a composer who created music especially for us! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

more pleasant music - just heard! - if you click on songs - did you know a string quartet with two cellos? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Pentecost was full of music, and my story today is that 300 years ago today, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Wihtburh
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Igor Grechanyk


Hello, Amitchell125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Igor Grechanyk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Walrus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supermarine Walrus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Bazzini
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pydnae
The article Pydnae you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pydnae and Talk:Pydnae/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Golden -- Golden (talk) 12:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pydnae
The article Pydnae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pydnae for comments about the article, and Talk:Pydnae/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Golden -- Golden (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and for passing the article, as I want to take it further at some point, I'll looks at addressing the issue regarding primary sources and make some amendments if possible. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 13:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem! I'm glad to hear that. I look forward to further improvements to this article and will keep it on my watchlist. If you need any help, I'm here for you. Best of luck! — Golden  call me maybe? 13:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Falaki Shirvani
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Lord Adolphus FitzClarence
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Order of Merit 1st Class of Ukraine


A tag has been placed on Template:Order of Merit 1st Class of Ukraine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_August_7. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Antiphellus
The article Antiphellus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Antiphellus and Talk:Antiphellus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 05:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Walrus
The article Supermarine Walrus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine Walrus for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine Walrus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

congratulations! - plenty of music on my talk now that our festival started where I saw and heard the enchanting Diana Tishchenko --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Antiphellus
The article Antiphellus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Antiphellus for comments about the article, and Talk:Antiphellus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Freedom4U -- Freedom4U (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Congratulations! - My story today pictures a friend whose birthday is today ;) - we listened to music she helped publishing - at a fancy place (which looked different when Bach played there). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Finally: June pictures updated, with three great RMF concerts! - My story today is very personal: the DYK appeared on Wikipedia's 15th birthday, and describes a concert I sang. I was requested to translate the bio into German for a memorial concert ... - see background, and we talked about life and death. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Today, I remember Reger's Requiem, and our choirs' jubilee 2 weeks ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

On today's Main page, you can find a cantata that Bach first performed 300 years ago, and an iconic saxophonist from East Germany. Also: a bit about the history of QAI on my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

While today's DYK highlights Santiago on his day, I did my modest share with my story today, describing what I just experienced, pictured. I began the article of the woman in green. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Today I remember Jahrhundertring, and I'm listening to Götterdämmerung from the Bayreuth Festival, close to the scene pictured, - the image (of a woman who can't believe what she has to see) features also on the article talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Supermarine S.4 scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 22 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/August 22, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

DeepStateMap.Live fixes
Hello @Amitchell125, I hope you're doing well. I see last week you placed two maintenance tags (primary and user generated) on an article I started a while back DeepStateMap.Live. While I have since removed the primary references tag after removing a particularly primary-cited sub-section (see my edit description for more) I am a little unsure on what you want me to do to remove the second tag, as I don't know which citations you found to be user-generated. If you could help me out with this, I would really appreciate it, as I am trying to get the article to GA status, and any input at all would be helpful 🙂 Thanks again, and sorry for how long it took for me to respond, I was camping last week. Cheers!  Johnson 524  (Talk!) 18:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, Telegram is used as a source in Refs 1/2/3/4/7 in the Primary section, and Ref 2 in the Secondary section. Why is it a reliable source, if it is user-generated (see here)? This also true for Facebook.(Sec. Ref 27). and Twitter (Sec. Refs12/24/26).


 * In addition, YouTube cannot be used as a source (Sec. Refs13/19/20/21/22/30) because of copyright issues (WP:ELNEVER).


 * A useful guide is Verifiability, which discusses how books, magazines, and newspapers are the best sources to use for citations. I would withdraw your nomination, and only renominate the article when the citations issue is sorted (at present the article can be quick-failed (WP:GAFAIL) because of the these issues). Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Amitchell125, thank you for your detailed response, and I'm sorry responding with a bit of delay. To try to go over each citation individually:
 * - P1: Is used only to record the date of their first Telegram post (no claims used) ✅
 * - P2: Is used to show DeepState has talked about COVID-19 (no claims used) ✅
 * - P3, P4: Non-controversial primary claims about the creation of their map, should be fine per WP:ABOUTSELF ✅
 * - P7: Primary claim on the use of their donations. I can delete this one if need be, as it is not an entirely non-controversial claim I guess
 * - S2: Made one non-controversial claim, but was on Telegram and was not a primary source, so I have since removed it ✅
 * - Every Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube: Is used to show these organizations have used the map before (no claims at all used, solely included for citing the pictures/video frames where the map is in displayed) ✅
 * I have put a check beside those citations I believe still check out with WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SOCIALMEDIA, or some other policy for their no-claims-made use, but please correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you again for taking the time to help me with this, I am reluctant to delist the article for GA review, as it has been in the queue for over two months now, and I would prefer not to restart the process. Thta being said, if I am incorrect in my beliefs on the fair use of the majority these citations, I will do so to clean-up the page. Cheers!  Johnson 524  (Talk!) 20:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I think cleanup tags are still an issue. There don't seem to be *any* secondary sources in the "Media attention and use" section. Why is it WP:DUE to list any organization that has ever referred to the map? The article needs to focus on secondary source coverage. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  15:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Swan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supermarine Swan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Swan
The article Supermarine Swan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Supermarine Swan and Talk:Supermarine Swan/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Swan
The article Supermarine Swan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine Swan for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine Swan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Failed GA nom
Buddy, I told you I wouldn't be able to return to the Piano Sonata No. 2 (Shostakovich) article until July 29. I even marked the date (PDT) so you know I'm working in the Pacific Time Zone over here, just in case you thought I was in your time zone (wherever that is). You agreed to wait—and then failed the nom anyway. If the wait was a problem, why not tell me so, instead of lying to me? Not nice. (P. S. I only found out about your message when I got to the computer—with the intent to work on the article!—after breakfast. You made a bad call and closed the review in bad faith. I hope you learn to be more civil with others in the future.) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Seamew
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Supermarine Seamew you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Supermarine Seamew
The article Supermarine Seamew you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Supermarine Seamew for comments about the article, and Talk:Supermarine Seamew/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Villa Road
Just wanted to say thanks for the GA review and the extra suggestions, cheers! Mujinga (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Flight International Magazine 1935-06-27-pdf 0075.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flight International Magazine 1935-06-27-pdf 0075.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 01:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Order of Merit 1st Class of Ukraine
Template:Order of Merit 1st Class of Ukraine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

August music
Today, my focus is on Renata Scotto, after days of updating. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:39, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you today for Supermarine S.4, "about R'J. Mitchell's revolutionary and beautiful-looking aircraft, designed as an entrant for the 1925 Schneider Trophy competition, but which crashed during navigation trials prior to the contest."! - My story today is an homage to Debussy on his birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

This too shall pass. - Ten years ago on 28 August, I heard a symphony, with a heavy heart because of the pending decision in WP:ARBINFOBOX, and not worried about my future here but Andy's. - It passed, and I could write the DYK about calling to dance, not battle, and Andy could write the DYK mentioning about peace and reconciliation, - look. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stazewski - Na scalonych ziemiach.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stazewski - Na scalonych ziemiach.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

October music
Today, it's a place that inspired me, musings if you have time. My corner for memory and music has today a juxtaposition of what our local church choirs offer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

A Romanian woman composer is today's topic. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Symphony No. 2 (Lyatoshynsky)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Symphony No. 2 (Lyatoshynsky) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CurryTime7-24 -- CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

November music
Vacation pictures offered if you click on songs, and my story today is a DYK hook from 13 years ago OTD: about the great music at one of my churches. Mozart's Requiem to come on Sunday, coupled with Arvo Pärt's Da pacem Domine, - I guess you might come if it was a bit closer. Perhaps watch the video of our last production, our first on yt, ever. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Symphony No. 2 (Lyatoshynsky)
The article Symphony No. 2 (Lyatoshynsky) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Lyatoshynsky) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CurryTime7-24 -- CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December greetings
Thank you for what you do and stand for! I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ranworth rood screen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ranworth rood screen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello - I've placed the Ranworth Rood On Hold, having finished with my comments. You should get the formal notice shortly. Let me know if you've any queries or need more than the 7 days. Thoroughly enjoyed the article, for which many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ranworth rood screen
The article Ranworth rood screen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ranworth rood screen and Talk:Ranworth rood screen/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 12:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

2024


Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

[[User talk:Gerda Arendt#2024|Happy New Year

2024]]

Same location pictured as 2019. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)