User talk:Amitkumarraut

Welcome!
Hello, Amitkumarraut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hum hain mata e kucha, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Hum hain mata e kucha


A tag has been placed on Hum hain mata e kucha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baps bhajan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Baps bhajan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BAPS Christchurch
Hello Amitkumarraut,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BAPS Christchurch for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, :.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christchurch Mandir


A tag has been placed on Christchurch Mandir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mean as custard (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christchurch mandir


A tag has been placed on Christchurch mandir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — Mike moral  ♪♫  06:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles for creation
If you have an idea for an article, Articles for creation will likely be a helpful resource for you to use rather than make the article in the article namespace. — Mike moral  ♪♫  07:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfication is always an option as well. I'd also like to state that when trying to defend a page, it's never a good idea to say things such as "mind your own business" and that they have "no right to". That goes against the idea of [[WP:CIVIL and doesn't help you out in the slightest. If anything, that actually hurts your cause rather than helps it because that makes you seem hostile to any incoming editors that might want to help you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Amitkumarraut/Christchurch Swaminarayan temple has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christchurch Swaminarayan temple, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 10:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430   talk to me  18:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm Faizan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User:Tokyogirl79, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fai zan  08:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Faizan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fai zan  9:28 am, 20 June 2013, last Thursday (4 days ago) (UTC+1)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Shyam avo te rang mune. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, do not add personal messages such as "This article is incomplete, please don't fiddle with it. I will edit it myself very soon.": this is an encyclopedia. Pam  D  07:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm A.amitkumar. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to User:Yunshui/About. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Amit (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyam avo te rang mune


A tag has been placed on Shyam avo te rang mune requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Amit (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Christchurch


A tag has been placed on BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Christchurch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Your article appears to be original research
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: photos of all the deities... "one of its kind" religious ceremony... ceremony was unique... All the people who attended this felt very blessed... Since then the support to BAPS has steadily increased... Rotorua currently has a big following of the faith... a dedicated priest... All the religious procedures and practices are strictly adhered to and followed by him... he is a very busy man...
 * the videos are available to purchase at the temple at a very nominal price. &mdash; we are not a sales site
 * It is no good accusing me of knowing little about your faith. I deleted the article because you did not follow our rules on referencing, notability and advertising. I see from this page that it is not the first time you have posted opinion pieces rather than encyclopaedia articles. If you want, I can sandbox the deleted text for you to improve to an acceptable standard  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''This attack is unwarranted as explained by Jimfbleak above. As for my username: ever heard of differences between British English and US English? Many people in the US are name "Randy". In the present case, it's short for "Miranda". Please have a look at the different help and guideline/policy pages on how to write an encyclopedic article. You cannot expect WP to adapt to you, you will have to adapt to WP. Thanks.'' Randykitty (talk) 10:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567516783 your edit] to Jai Swaminarayan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * sig=d4A4YQoBwbc1Z2rwlpxTgUoudkU An Introduction to Swaminarayan Hinduism, by Raymond Brady Williams Cambridge University Press  The literal meaning of the term is, "Hail Lord Swaminarayan."

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

deleted text
You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I'll shortly post the deleted text here shortly for you to reference and improve  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, your only reference doesn't even mention the temple let alone support what you have written about it. Take a bit of time and find references that actually confirm what you are saying. Also think about adding links to other article, I've added Krishna, but the other gods will have articles too. Also, shouldn't it be "lady" rather than "lordess" for goddesses?  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Fair enough with lordess, it's not something I've come across before. I don't know whether BAPS has the information or not, what I do know is that it's not on the page you gave as your reference. If you put the wrong page, please correct it  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * You confirm it by giving your references. If you don't have any, it's original research, which is not permitted.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I fixed a typo in one of the refs. I'm not totally convinced, but I accept that you are writing in good faith. You should use the "move" tab to move the article back to its original title, but you cannot do that until the short article you put there has been deleted (I mean deleted, not just blanked). I'll do that for you, but I'm going to leave it for a day so that you can improve the article by adding more links and categories. You should do that because, as it stands, the article may be nominated for deletion again. The better it looks, the more likely it is to survive  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  14:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~.
 * Print publications are OK as references as long as you give full details (author, title, publisher, isbn, pages) Independent sources such as newspapers are better than those closely associated with the temple if that is possible
 * To add images, start here. Note that if the photos are not taken by you personally, you are very likely to run into copyright problems  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Add categories like . I've done this one, you will find it at the bottom of your page. A bot might remove it while the article is in the sandbox, but you know how to do it now
 *  Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  05:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It should be to the right of the "view history" tab. It's possible that you might not have made enough edits for it to be enabled <b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;"> Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  08:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Article <b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;"> Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  11:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, the article is there. I don't know how the search works, but my guess would be that it lists the first eight in order of how often they are searched (Toronto comes before Chicago, so it's not alphabetical) and yours, as a new article, doesn't make the cut. Ask here <b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;"> Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  05:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

NPA
Hello, I'm A13ean. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. a13ean (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your question
On the deleted talk page, you asked "are you the editor of Wikipedia? It is a free space to share information." I am a Wikipedia editor, and I am also an administrator. And I'm afraid you misunderstand Wikipedia. It is not "a free space to share information". It is an encyclopaedia. If and when the temple has achieved the necessary notability (not counting any initial publicity campaigning), then will be time to consider an article. One month and about a week is hardly time. There are plenty of places like MySpace and Facebook for 'sharing information'. Wikipedia is not here for the promotion of any entity. Peridon (talk) 18:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Kudrat
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kudrat, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekabhishektalk 10:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You might like to read this Referencing for beginners.--Ekabhishektalk 08:08, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Hum hain mata e koocha (August 23)
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:0.5em;width:20em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;margin-left: 1.5em;width: 90%;"> Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Northamerica1000(talk) 02:11, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghanshyam Rafaliya


A tag has been placed on Ghanshyam Rafaliya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christchurch Swaminarayan temple concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christchurch Swaminarayan temple, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christchurch Swaminarayan temple


Hello Amitkumarraut. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Christchurch Swaminarayan temple".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 00:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hum hain mata e koocha concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hum hain mata e koocha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hum hain mata e koocha


Hello Amitkumarraut. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Hum hain mata e koocha".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)