User talk:Amlevine1

August 2020
Hello Amlevine1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amlevine1. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello MrOllie, thank you for your message. I do not believe I fall into a category with a conflict of interest. I am student focused on design, with further background in law and business. I am committed to making unbiased updates of Wikipedia. I did not, and do not receive financial remuneration for these updates. I have focused on the topic of psycho-aesthetics because I am studying it and the topic provided an opportunity to become a Wikipedia editor through substantive edits where I can provide expertise. I did not realize that focusing on it as my first topic would cause an issue. However, without more information your concern is understood. I look forward to contributing toward a wider variety of topics where I have expertise. Please let me know if this is sufficient, or if you would like further clarification. Thank you. Can you confirm whether I can/should proceed with my previous edits?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Psycho-Aesthetics (September 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SL93&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 02:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

RKS Design moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, RKS Design, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 00:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics
Hello, Amlevine1. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 03:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Psycho-Aesthetics


Hello, Amlevine1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Psycho-Aesthetics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)