User talk:Amlm17/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Design


 * Warning post: possible inappropriate or misinterpreted citations that do no verify the text.
 * The main definition section included too many examples that distracted from the main definition of the topic.
 * The third paragraph seems to be more opinionated than factual.
 * There are many opinion and biased based sentences.
 * Many sources come from "ScienceDirect".
 * Many of the links only lead to abstracts instead of the actual content.

It looks like you noticed some key problems in this article. Make one change to help fix this? K8ndrs (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)k8ndrs