User talk:Ammon86

Welcome!
Welcome in Wikipedia!!! --Umedard Talk 16:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

question
Would you like to join Conservapedia as a editor? Conservapedia is looking for good editors and Admins. Please send me your email if you want to join Conservapedia. If you feel reticient about giving out your email address you can simply create a new account at hotmail and yahoo so you don't risk getting a lot of junk mail. Regional123 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Regional123

Real Politics Union: conservative liberal or liberal conservative?
Dlaczego zmieniłeś ideologię partii z konserwatywno-liberalnej na liberalny konserwatyzm? Przecież w statucie partii jest napisane: "Partia konserwatywno-liberalna o nazwie Unia Polityki Realnej, w skrócie UPR, jest zarejestrowaną partią polityczną."

Zgadzam się z wyjaśnieniami. Choć trzeba przyznać, że UPR można zaliczyć do Right-libertarianism. Może po za sprzeciwem wobec aborcji, eutanazji i związkom homoseksualnym jest partią konserwatywną. Jednak separacja państwa od Kościoła, legalizacja narkotyków i znaczna część programu przesuwają ją w kierunku libertariańskim. Dodam także, że program UPR razcej zgadza się w 4 na 5 podanych punktach z Conservative liberalism. Musimy przyznać, że u Anglosasów liczba doktryn politycznych stale rośnie. :) Pozdrawiam.

Notice
Whether or not Real Politics Union is conservative liberal or not, Conservative liberalism was proposed for deletion. --Checco 23:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

PO and trade unions
I write 'cos I know you are an expert of Polish politics. A user repeatedly cancelled the "[labor law]] reform to reduce the power of trade unions" from the section about the political platform of PO. Do you tink that it has been correct to remove it or not? See also Talk:Civic Platform. --Checco 12:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try to answer your question on the weekend, because I need some time to check references and so on. Ammon86 15:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --Checco (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for toning down some of the references to Christians as extreme or far-right. Even if I don't agree with some of their individual stances, Wikipedia would hardly allow for the same treatment of others, and it's no reason to make Christians look ridiculous. CopaceticThought (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Charismatic Wikipedians
I've proposed to rename the user category Category:Charismatic Wikipedians. Since you are listed a member, you may be interested in participating in the discussion.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments (Edit summaries)
By the way, you might want to give explanations for your edits in the "Edit summary" field. On the Sally Kern page, I honestly thought you meant to delete the "Criticism of Islam" category, but removed the "Homophobia" category by accident. --Bertrc (talk) 00:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi! Why?
What was your reason for this revert? I can vaguely remember reading about it that it was accused of being a cult and "political groups hostile to the West" doesn't sound very encyclopaedic to me... it would be better to give the names of those groups. "citizens of Kiev who suspect his church is really a cult" is probably closer to the truth. Mariah-Yulia (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Church of Glory


A tag has been placed on Church of Glory, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Britishfinance (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2019 (UTC)