User talk:Ammpitta

October 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 13:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Wikipedia administrator HJ Mitchell,
 * I am writing to appeal my block, which was issued yesterday for "adding spam links". I now understand how I violated Wikipedia's policies by adding content that can be challenged and similar links. I am truly sorry for my actions, and I understand why I was blocked.
 * I have taken the time to read and understand Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to following them in the future. I believe I can be a valued member of the Wikipedia community, and I want to continue to contribute to the encyclopedia in a constructive way, not only by donating as I've been doing in the past, but by contributing really helpful content. As an MBA graduate and a few written thesis I believe I can be of great contribution to the Wikipedia community in certain areas in the education field and the digital scope.
 * It seems that I was wrong thinking that a website offering credible information directly from schools and school experts was in place as I thought it was right due to the "Verifiability" I misread. It states that articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources, such as reputable newspapers and scholarly journals. World Schools being a platform through which schools share their most exciting news and some peer-reviewed articles I believed it was a reliable source but it isn't classified as a scholarly journal.
 * I would be grateful if you would lift my block. I understand the consequences of similar actions and I won't be doing similar unthought actions in the future.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration.
 * Sincerely,
 * Anna Mari Pitta Ammpitta (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I'm following up on my request to be unblocked. I'm kindly resending my email requesting the unblock. Thank you in advance.
 * Dear Wikipedia administrator HJ Mitchell,
 * I am writing to appeal my block, which was issued yesterday for "adding spam links". I now understand how I violated Wikipedia's policies by adding content that can be challenged and similar links. I am truly sorry for my actions, and I understand why I was blocked.
 * I have taken the time to read and understand Wikipedia's policies, and I am committed to following them in the future. I believe I can be a valued member of the Wikipedia community, and I want to continue to contribute to the encyclopedia in a constructive way, not only by donating as I've been doing in the past, but by contributing really helpful content. As an MBA graduate and a few written thesis I believe I can be of great contribution to the Wikipedia community in certain areas in the education field and the digital scope.
 * It seems that I was wrong thinking that a website offering credible information directly from schools and school experts was in place as I thought it was right due to the "Verifiability" I misread. It states that articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources, such as reputable newspapers and scholarly journals. World Schools being a platform through which schools share their most exciting news and some peer-reviewed articles I believed it was a reliable source but it isn't classified as a scholarly journal.
 * I would be grateful if you would lift my block. I understand the consequences of similar actions and I won't be doing similar unthought actions in the future.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration.
 * Sincerely,
 * Anna Mari Pitta Ammpitta (talk) 12:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)