User talk:Amodio11

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big Girls Don't Cry (Fergie song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AIR corn (talk) 09:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Italian people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 10:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Celts. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ''and other articles. I'm reverting some of your edits where you've changed numbers with no explanation. This looks like number vandalism and I would like an explanation of those edits. Communication with other editors is a vital part of Wikipedia, and editors who do not communicate often end up blocked.'' Dougweller (talk) 09:46, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. That's much better, although it probably needs sourcing. Dougweller (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Income tax in the United States, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bearian (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Please see WP:3RR and WP:RS before your return here. You can not repeatedly insert information, especially contentious matters, without good citations. Bearian (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. The record shows that you were warned four times here and you continued in your reckless actions. Bearian (talk) 14:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Veganism
Would you please care to show a better standard than this when dealing with blatant vandalism? Agreeing or condoning this sort of behavior is counterproductive and unconstructive. Perhaps warning the user/IP and explaining to them as to why their edits are inappropriate, may be the best approach one can take. Please exercise caution for future references. Kind regards, —— Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 11:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)