User talk:Amolakh

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 17:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi Amolakh / Agra article
I'm sorry if your feelings got hurt when I removed the Ram Bagh additions you made. It happens all the time, however!

Sorry, but you can't copy web page text into Wikipedia articles. It must be original material or public domain or specifically OK to copy. Unless a web page specifically says that is available to copy, Wikipedia doesn't allow it to be copied.

Pictures cannot be copied, as rule.

You can read another web page and rewrite it in your own words, however.

I would be glad if you added Agra information in your own words. I would be pleased to help edit your work, and not remove it.

At first glance, it looks like some of your other changes may also be copied from other websites. If this info is just copied from other websites, it will have to be removed also, sorry.

--Nemonoman 19:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

yes I have been seeing all that you have been doing is ramming your views down other people Throat on how Agra should be spelled etc

Amolakh: please feel free to change what needs changing. Removing the accent from Agra was done in keeping with the Wikipedia Indian Cities project. I don't particularly like having my editing described as "ramming your views downn other people Throat". You've just started editing today, apparently; I hope you'll learn to be more moderate in how you talk to your fellow editors.

I notice that you didn't like my discussion of what translations belong on the Taj Mahal page. I raised the point and said what I thought -- but I didn't remove the translations just because I didn't like them. Other people made reasonable points, and I accepted them even though I disagree. So please don't just say "ramming" until you've looked further into the matter. Thanks. --Nemonoman 20:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Nope cause I am leaving wikipedia if people like you are here and refusing to put information no need for me to put any information

Source and license information required for Image:Maywati.jpg
Please go to the concerned page and cite sources and licensing information for the image. The image might be speedy deleted within a period of time if you dont. Regards. -- Andy123  (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Maywati.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maywati.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.65.227 09:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Maywati.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maywati.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.65.227 09:39, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Amarsingh.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Amarsingh.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Taj Mahal RFC

 * I've filed an RFC relating to the Taj Mahal at Talk:Taj Mahal. Your comments would be most welcome. Joopercoopers 18:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gulzarilal_Nanda.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gulzarilal_Nanda.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bleh999 07:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Seal_Agra_University.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Seal_Agra_University.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 07:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

File:InsideChini Ka Roza.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:InsideChini Ka Roza.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 13:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Chini Ka Roza.jpg


The file File:Chini Ka Roza.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low-res, better files at c:Category:Chini Ka Rauza"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Min☠︎rax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)