User talk:Amoore77

Copyright problems with Eagle Hill Cemetery
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Eagle Hill Cemetery, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Eagle Hill Cemetery appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Eagle Hill Cemetery has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Guest9999 (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eagle Hill Cemetery


The article Eagle Hill Cemetery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Violates WP:NN, no external sources available

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Panoptical (talk) 04:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eagle Hill Cemetery


The article Eagle Hill Cemetery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Re-instating this PROD. Old cemeteries may be notable, but not necessarily so. I think it was rather arrogant to remove the PROD, with the glib statement 'look for references', assuming that neither my original notability tag nor panoptical's prod was added without making some effort to do this. Maybe it is notable, but having done a few searches, I can find nothing. Having dealt with many new pages, and helped many more worthy ones on the way, it is my opinion that this is not one of them. Nova Scotia is littered with old graveyards, but few are of encyclopaedic interest. It should also be noted that the original author has a conflict of interest. The onus I feel is with the originator, or other interested editors to demonstrate notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)