User talk:AmorLucis

Welcome!
Hi AmorLucis! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Revert
Hi AmorLucis, I know it can be frustrating to see your initial efforts in Wikipedia be undone. I hope you'll take a look at WP:Original research, which discusses why well-written and researched content is not necessarily appropriate for Wikipedia. If you disagree with my reversion, I am happy to talk through my reasoning more, with Talk:Juneteenth being the best place for such a discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Talk page guidelines, not a forum
I removed your recent post to Talk:Juneteenth because it was a diatribe against Wikipedia policies and bias. It was not constructive. Talk page guidelines may be seen at WP:TPG, and WP:NOTFORUM is more specific about what the talk page should not contain. Binksternet (talk) 21:28, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Also please read wp:rs wp:v, wp:not and wp:or. Also read WP:NOTDUMB.Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

You might also want to read wp:forumshop, so far you seem to have raised this issue in three separate places, each time not getting the answer you wanted.Slatersteven (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

I did not post in other places because I "did not get the answer I wanted to hear." That is straight up a form of gaslighting. It's reading my mind and it's also talking about my motive. THAT is a violation of Wiki standard for respectful communicaiton. So why would I take advice from someone who themselves is violating talk page standards, proving my point that Wikipedia normalizes gaslighting and calls boundaries against it "abuse," which is a neutrality problem?

And...wikipedia offers the option of posting on other forums and then gaslights people when they do? So why have other forums, then?

I went to different forums because 1) I am seeing clear bias on talk pages towards this edit 2) I did get different answers from different forums, that shed more light on Wikipedia's neutrality problems and 3) this is not about "sources" it's about a bias in Wikipedia, and I cogently argued that repeatedly because people aren't addressing it.

Please do not post on my talk page again. You have normalized your own toxic communication as "helping." And that's incredibly toxic and manipulating.

12:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)AmorLucis (talk)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 10:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)