User talk:Amorite Mercenary

Welcome!
Hello, Amorite Mercenary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao was changed by Amorite Mercenary (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874207 on 2017-05-23T22:04:39+00:00.

Joelle Behlok
Hi. I have Joelle Behlok on my watchlist, probably because I requested it be deleted. Accordingly, I've noticed your illegitimate attempt to re-create it. I'm watching Joelle Behlock, too, so I can have that deleted when necessary. I recommend you create a user sandbox and develop an entry there and then submit that draft for review. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

I wonder why the page has been deleted in the first place though?! I read that someone claims that this person is not notable !! How come? She reached the semi-finals of Miss World 1997; moreover she has two pictures uploaded here !! so why do you claim that it is an illegitimate attempt to re-create an article for her ?! Amorite Mercenary (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You claim you "read that someone claims that this person is not notable". Well, then you have your answer. Wikipedia has a bunch of notability criteria. Subjects have to pass just one of them for us to have an article on them. We don't have any special criteria for contestants in beauty pageants, CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, or Ambassadors of G8 countries. All those subjects have to be generally notable, which she isn't. That's why I'm recommending that you build a draft first and get some help with it, and when it's ready it can be accepted. If you go about this the wrong way it's going to turn out bad for you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

LOL ! Mini-Troutman (you would consider this as a personal attack which sensitive Wikipedians dont like ... well .. you are the one who hit the hornets nest) is trying to be a smarta** by saying that I should not wonder about the first deletion, and by giving lame examples such as "CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, or Ambassadors of G8 countries" ! How rude !

Joelle is well-known in her region as I mentioned earlier, and she has a Wikipedia article in 4 languages. You cannot decide who is considered as "famous" and according to which criteria, because I can tell that you do not know who is the president of Malawi for instance ! I am not writing a Masters thesis under Troutman supervision to prepare a draft for the article ! I guess that we are adults enough to overcome these cheap rants that you have started ! Amorite Mercenary (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Joelle Behlock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joelle Behlock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joelle Behlock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 19:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Abuse of multiple accounts
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)