User talk:Amorp

July 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ibrahim Ali (Malaysia). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Yk ʏк yƙ talk ~ contrib 13:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ibrahim Ali (Malaysia), you may be blocked from editing. — Yk ʏк yƙ talk ~ contrib 13:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

NPOV
My editing on Ibrahim Ali is provided with valid reference from published sources. There is no element of "my own analysis" or "original research" as indicated by Wikipedia. So what is the problem of enriching the database with additonal information? – copied from User talk:Yk Yk Yk.


 * Thank you for agreeing to discuss this. I'm sorry for the misleading messages, which came from the warning templates. The point I'm trying to get across is you should adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Placing a disparaging poem from a letter to a blog (not a reliable source) on a biography of a living person clearly violates that. You are encouraged to contribute to the criticism section of Ibrahim Ali (Malaysia), but any additions must be from an objective point of view, not written with the intent to mock the subject. — Yk ʏк yƙ  talk ~ contrib 13:54, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * A blog is not a reliable source, much less a letter to the blog. The poem you added is clearly with the intent of mocking Ibrahim Ali. The poem is not encyclopedic information. I have reverted it again. Please do not persist in re-adding it. — Yk ʏк yƙ talk ~ contrib 14:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. Wikipedia takes biographies of living persons very seriously. If you're here to build an encyclopedia, I suggest you read that policy thoroughly. — Yk ʏк yƙ talk ~ contrib 14:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)