User talk:Amosgitaiasst

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Amos Gitai, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  16:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, it so happens I am Gitai's PA and hold this information from his own mouth and his official CV, that is already cited as reference. Do you really wish me to reference each and every sentence to his won web site that holds this info ? honestly ?
 * Hi there. Firstly, you shouldn't be editing this article at all as you have a conflict of interest. Secondly, you keep repeatedly changing the wording to not only be worse, as in it's broken English, but your changes are in a promotional tone and as such I have been reverting them. Your most recent change cited his official page as a reference for the statement "His films have brought him considerable international recognition rewarded by many prizes in the most important festivals" - this is not allowed as per Wikipedias verifiability policy. Lastly, I do indeed want you to back every statement up with a reference, as that's the way Wikipedia works. They should *not* all be referenced by the same site, but a variety, and these should not be self-published as per the policy linked above. Failure to comply with these rules will end up with your additions being removed. Let me know if you've questions regarding any of this,  Nik the  stoned  09:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Amos Gitai. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  11:18, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amos Gitai, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  13:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Amos Gitai. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  13:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Your conflict of interest editing
Hi. I, once again, had to revert your removal of negative opinions on this page. So you know, rather than (as per this time) me removing only the parts that are incorrect, I shall simply be reverting the whole change as this is taking up far too much time, and you have been repeatedly warned. Cheers,  Nik the  stoned  14:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Nik the  stoned  13:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Amos Gitai. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.  Nik the  stoned  13:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive Editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 18:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)