User talk:Amourduluxe

Nomination of Kiriti Rambhatla for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiriti Rambhatla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kiriti Rambhatla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:24051987DU153


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mdann52 (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kiriti Rambhatla, you may be blocked from editing. This edit was unambiguous vandalism, and your moving the article from one nonsense title to another was unconstructive. If you think there are good reasons why the article should not be deleted, then please explain why at the deletion discussion. Do not try to evade deletion by a clumsy attempt to hide the article, which would not fool anyone. Also, perhaps you somehow failed to notice that the deletion discussion notice says "the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed". JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)