User talk:Amovrvs

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to PVI, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: PVI was changed by Amovrvs (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-07T07:01:58+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Life Union Corporation
A tag has been placed on Life Union Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - AWeenieMan (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Brittaniaville, Massachusetts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Icestorm815 (talk) 17:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brent Redstone
A tag has been placed on Brent Redstone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Evan Seeds ( talk )( contrib. ) 00:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Slut has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  00:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lukin Sigillo
A tag has been placed on Lukin Sigillo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 22:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Jennie Elizabeth Eisenhower
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jennie Elizabeth Eisenhower, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Jennie Eisenhower. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you feel an different title is appropriate, you move the article. Copy&pasting throws away the edit history, making it look as though you deserve all the credit. Also, you failed to move the talk page. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of John V of Nassau-Dillenburg
A tag has been placed on John V of Nassau-Dillenburg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ejay (talk) 02:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Life Union
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Life Union, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Life Union. ukexpat (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Life Union
I have nominated Life Union, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Life Union. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ukexpat (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message on my talk page. For the article to survive the AfD nomination, you will have to provide some verifiable sources/references. The essence of Wikipedia is that articles must have references and that those references must be verifiable. Please feel free to contribute to the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Life Union. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * By all means edit the article to add more references if you have them -- they will be taken into account in the AfD discussion. – ukexpat (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Massachusetts
Hi there. I reverted your edit to the Massachusetts article, as "Massachusetts Bay Colony" is a more appropriate and commonly used term for the geographical area in question. Fullobeans (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Governor_and_Company_of_the_Mattachusetts_Bay_in_Newe-England
I have nominated Governor_and_Company_of_the_Mattachusetts_Bay_in_Newe-England, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Governor_and_Company_of_the_Mattachusetts_Bay_in_Newe-England. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fullobeans (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not to spam your talk page, but I would like to leave you a non-template note encouraging you to weigh in on the discussion at Articles for deletion/Governor_and_Company_of_the_Mattachusetts_Bay_in_Newe-England. You appear to have created a few (mostly orphaned) stubs on related topics involving colonial Massachusetts history, and it would be helpful if you explained the goals of your contributions. You seem to be working on something interesting, and it would be a waste to delete this particular article if it can be improved through merging or editing. Hope to hear from you! Fullobeans (talk) 02:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Praedictus Juratus
An article that you have been involved in editing, Praedictus Juratus, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Governor and Company of the Mattachusetts Bay in Newe-England. Thank you. Deor (talk) 03:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Isaac de Rassiers
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Isaac de Rassiers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Isaac de Rassiers. Deor (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your contributions
Before you decide to create any new articles or make alterations to any existing ones, it might be a good idea to ask yourself whether you're really sure of the accuracy of the information you're contributing. Wikipedia requires that all the information that appears in it be verifiable through reliable secondary sources, and I've noticed that the information you've been adding is seldom, if ever, accompanied by references to such sources. It's not particularly fair to expect other editors to sort out what is valuable in your contributions from what is the result of misunderstandings or lack of knowledge on your part. Deor (talk) 04:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Taunton Branch Railroad
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Taunton Branch Railroad, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Taunton Branch Railroad. Deor (talk) 14:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

RfD
The redirects Pons facere and Pons Facere, which you have created or edited, have been nominated for deletion. If you wish to comment on the matter, do so at Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 March 30. Deor (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brent Redstone
An editor has nominated Brent Redstone, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Counties of New York City
An article that you have been involved in editing, Counties of New York City, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Counties of New York City. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deor (talk) 03:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Stanton T. Friedman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stanton T. Friedman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gaii
An article that you have been involved in editing, Gaii, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Gaii. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deor (talk) 05:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gaii
A tag has been placed on Gaii, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Celarnor Talk to me 05:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sestertium, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deor (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sestertium
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sestertium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sestertium. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deor (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Response
The only edits of yours that I've reverted are ones that have added irrelevant or incomprehensible text to articles. I've recommended articles that you've created for deletion when they were on topics that don't meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (mostly because of lack of verifiability). I gave you some advice in the message "Regarding your contributions" above, and the best I can do is to direct you to that message once again. Deor (talk) 02:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I gave my reasons for nominating the sestertium article for deletion at Articles for deletion/Sestertium. If you disagree with them, I suggest you go there and make your case. Deor (talk) 03:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of David wheatcroft
A tag has been placed on David wheatcroft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:02-08 150x150px.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:02-08 150x150px.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 09:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dubai Opera Ball
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dubai Opera Ball, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Dubai Opera Ball. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deor (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kristin Hoffmann
A tag has been placed on Kristin Hoffmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. It's me...Sallicio!$\color{Red} \oplus$ 04:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Roman Empire 125.svg jpeg version
Hi Joshua, I read on Andrei Nacu's user talk page that you wanted a jpeg version of Roman Empire 125.svg (and wanted to know how to make one). I've made a jpeg version for you here. You can make one yourself easily. If the image is a svg type file, wikipedia always stores a full size png version of the file for use on the wikipedia (not all browsers support svg files). To get this file: You now have the png version. To convert it to jpeg open it in an image editing program (microsoft paint, photoshop, the gimp, doesn't matter) and save it as jpg. To be able to view the svg files directly in internet explorer, use adobe svg viewer. Other browsers like Firefox and google chrome have svg support built in. Ok hope that helps! Richardprins (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Go to any wikipedia page
 * Click edit
 * Type [[image:Roman Empire 125.svg]] (replace Roman Empire 125.svg with the svg of your choice)
 * Click Show preview (not: Save page!)
 * You will now see the preview page with the full size png
 * Right click that image and save it

April 2009
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when.  The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 14:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charter of Virginia
A tag has been placed on Charter of Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. billinghurst (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles III of the United Kingdom
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles III of the United Kingdom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Almost no information, the little information present can easily be stated on the page Prince Charles of Wales

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Intelligent  sium  01:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William V of the United Kingdom
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William V of the United Kingdom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CRYSTAL

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 02:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Me October 2008.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Me October 2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Zoo Fari  04:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PI5Send1.Jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PI5Send1.Jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AllenS (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Me Hartford CT March 10, 2010.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me Hartford CT March 10, 2010.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Me in October 2009.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me in October 2009.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Me Hartford March 10, 2010.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me Hartford March 10, 2010.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:December 2009 Snowstorm.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:December 2009 Snowstorm.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:23, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Plaisirs de l’Île enchantée


The article Plaisirs de l’Île enchantée has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable one-off event. I'm unclear as to how an article about a single royal party in the sevententh century (without even a specified date) can be evolved into anything resembling a stand-alone article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. da nn o _ u k 20:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Charles III of the United Kingdom listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charles III of the United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Charles III of the United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ibicdlcod (talk) 13:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DJ Colette


The article DJ Colette has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Amovrvs
, I don't rightly understand what you're doing on that user page, but hey, to each his own. Anyway, what I really don't understand is why you don't use your current user page: it just looks real strange to see one account editing another's user page. Also, please make sure you don't use two accounts in a manner inconsistent with our policies--WP:SOCK, for instance. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Maybe I answer here, not sure. In any case, amovrvs is my name it forwards to. That's ok, it works. It's my latin name. What I am doing with the page, it's an analysis of the roman gold rate sestertius with the perihelion which is the determination of the great pyramid's height and measurement system. It translates to the inches we use now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshualeefreeman (talk • contribs) 08:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I figured it out and have Joshualeefreeman as it is. thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshualeefreeman (talk • contribs) 08:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Charles III of the United Kingdom listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charles III of the United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Charles III of the United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann
User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.   Ravenswing   02:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann


A tag has been placed on User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, Amovrvs. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but User:Amovrvs/KristinHoffmann has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Identifying blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD give the appearance of an editor violating Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.


 * There is more information at Community portal. There is help available at THE TEAHOUSE. Cheers, and happy editing. --Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Josh Freeman Titicut Church Dec 6 2009.jpg


The file File:Josh Freeman Titicut Church Dec 6 2009.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:March2007.jpg


The file File:March2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sphinx me Scotland Links.jpg


The file File:Sphinx me Scotland Links.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)