User talk:Amp-e728

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracy Pun Palandjian (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tracy Pun Palandjian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Tracy_Pun_Palandjian Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spiderone&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tracy_Pun_Palandjian reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Give me a hint. There are many inline citations in the page I submitted. How am I to know what it is you object to based on "References not formatted in the appropriate way? I edited using the visual editor and everything I included is cited to publicly-available and legitimate sources. Please provide some direction so that I can know exactly what isn't acceptable. Amp-e728 (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tracy Pun Palandjian has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tracy Pun Palandjian. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Amp-e728. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Amp-e728. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m not being paid. I would have disclosed that. Not sure why you sound so accusatory. This is about someone who runs a nonprofit that I respect, that’s all. Amp-e728 (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)